Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps

2012-03-15 Thread Norman Elton
> I don't see any differences... Just save your config files and replace them > later when rpm "goes live" If anyone's interested, 2.1.12 builds fine with the specfile included in the source release. I had to rebuild the certificate patch file and include a few extra man files in the manifest. Sim

Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps

2012-03-12 Thread Marinko Tarlac
I don't see any differences... Just save your config files and replace them later when rpm "goes live" On 3/12/2012 8:34 PM, Norman Elton wrote: And we are expecting to ship freeradius 2.1.12 in the RHEL 6.3 update. Any chance you can post the 2.1.12 packages to test? I can compile FR by hand,

Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps

2012-03-12 Thread John Dennis
On 03/12/2012 03:34 PM, Norman Elton wrote: And we are expecting to ship freeradius 2.1.12 in the RHEL 6.3 update. Any chance you can post the 2.1.12 packages to test? I can compile FR by hand, but testing the RPM would be good. No, I'm sorry I cannot pre-release packages. However if you are

Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps

2012-03-12 Thread Norman Elton
> And we are expecting to ship freeradius 2.1.12 in the RHEL 6.3 update. Any chance you can post the 2.1.12 packages to test? I can compile FR by hand, but testing the RPM would be good. Thanks, Norman Elton - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps

2012-03-12 Thread John Dennis
On 03/12/2012 11:33 AM, Fred wrote: Just a little remark : CentOS 5.8 has up-to-date freeradius 2.1.12 (binary and sources) CentOS 6.2 only has freeradius 2.1.10 from upstream (redhat 6.2). And we are expecting to ship freeradius 2.1.12 in the RHEL 6.3 update. -- John Dennis Looking to carve

Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps

2012-03-12 Thread Fred
Just a little remark : CentOS 5.8 has up-to-date freeradius 2.1.12 (binary and sources) CentOS 6.2 only has freeradius 2.1.10 from upstream (redhat 6.2). Best regards, Fred MAISON Le 6 mars 2012 13:06, Fajar A. Nugraha a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Martin Mielke wrote: >> This is

Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps

2012-03-06 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Martin Mielke wrote: > This is part of an OS consolidation project which started some time ago. > There were too many Linux-flavours like Debian, Slackware, Fedora, CentOS, > RedHat 4, Mandriva... thus making maintenance, support and administration > more complic

RE: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps

2012-03-06 Thread Martin Mielke
eradius.org > Subject: Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps > > Migrating from CentOS5 to RHEL5 ? Whats the point ? > > Especially when CentOS6.x/RHEL6.x is already here... > > On 3/5/2012 5:38 PM, Martin Mielke wrote: > > All, > > > > At my new wo

Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps

2012-03-06 Thread Bjørn Mork
Alan Buxey writes: > >> At my new working place I have inherited a FR 1.1.3 running on CentOS 5.6. >> Beyond being outdated and unsupported, this FR setup is causing a lot of >> problems so I plan a migration to RHEL5 and FR 2.1.12. >> I've been searching but I cannot find a procedure describing

Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps

2012-03-05 Thread Marinko Tarlac
Migrating from CentOS5 to RHEL5 ? Whats the point ? Especially when CentOS6.x/RHEL6.x is already here... On 3/5/2012 5:38 PM, Martin Mielke wrote: All, At my new working place I have inherited a FR 1.1.3 running on CentOS 5.6. Beyond being outdated and unsupported, this FR setup is causing a l

Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps

2012-03-05 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, > At my new working place I have inherited a FR 1.1.3 running on CentOS 5.6. > Beyond being outdated and unsupported, this FR setup is causing a lot of > problems so I plan a migration to RHEL5 and FR 2.1.12. > I've been searching but I cannot find a procedure describing which steps to > fol