> I don't see any differences... Just save your config files and replace them
> later when rpm "goes live"
If anyone's interested, 2.1.12 builds fine with the specfile included
in the source release. I had to rebuild the certificate patch file and
include a few extra man files in the manifest. Sim
I don't see any differences... Just save your config files and replace
them later when rpm "goes live"
On 3/12/2012 8:34 PM, Norman Elton wrote:
And we are expecting to ship freeradius 2.1.12 in the RHEL 6.3 update.
Any chance you can post the 2.1.12 packages to test? I can compile FR
by hand,
On 03/12/2012 03:34 PM, Norman Elton wrote:
And we are expecting to ship freeradius 2.1.12 in the RHEL 6.3 update.
Any chance you can post the 2.1.12 packages to test? I can compile FR
by hand, but testing the RPM would be good.
No, I'm sorry I cannot pre-release packages. However if you are
> And we are expecting to ship freeradius 2.1.12 in the RHEL 6.3 update.
Any chance you can post the 2.1.12 packages to test? I can compile FR
by hand, but testing the RPM would be good.
Thanks,
Norman Elton
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 03/12/2012 11:33 AM, Fred wrote:
Just a little remark :
CentOS 5.8 has up-to-date freeradius 2.1.12 (binary and sources)
CentOS 6.2 only has freeradius 2.1.10 from upstream (redhat 6.2).
And we are expecting to ship freeradius 2.1.12 in the RHEL 6.3 update.
--
John Dennis
Looking to carve
Just a little remark :
CentOS 5.8 has up-to-date freeradius 2.1.12 (binary and sources)
CentOS 6.2 only has freeradius 2.1.10 from upstream (redhat 6.2).
Best regards,
Fred MAISON
Le 6 mars 2012 13:06, Fajar A. Nugraha a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Martin Mielke wrote:
>> This is
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Martin Mielke wrote:
> This is part of an OS consolidation project which started some time ago.
> There were too many Linux-flavours like Debian, Slackware, Fedora, CentOS,
> RedHat 4, Mandriva... thus making maintenance, support and administration
> more complic
eradius.org
> Subject: Re: FreeRADIUS 1.1.2 -> 2.1.12 migration steps
>
> Migrating from CentOS5 to RHEL5 ? Whats the point ?
>
> Especially when CentOS6.x/RHEL6.x is already here...
>
> On 3/5/2012 5:38 PM, Martin Mielke wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > At my new wo
Alan Buxey writes:
>
>> At my new working place I have inherited a FR 1.1.3 running on CentOS 5.6.
>> Beyond being outdated and unsupported, this FR setup is causing a lot of
>> problems so I plan a migration to RHEL5 and FR 2.1.12.
>> I've been searching but I cannot find a procedure describing
Migrating from CentOS5 to RHEL5 ? Whats the point ?
Especially when CentOS6.x/RHEL6.x is already here...
On 3/5/2012 5:38 PM, Martin Mielke wrote:
All,
At my new working place I have inherited a FR 1.1.3 running on CentOS 5.6.
Beyond being outdated and unsupported, this FR setup is causing a l
Hi,
> At my new working place I have inherited a FR 1.1.3 running on CentOS 5.6.
> Beyond being outdated and unsupported, this FR setup is causing a lot of
> problems so I plan a migration to RHEL5 and FR 2.1.12.
> I've been searching but I cannot find a procedure describing which steps to
> fol
11 matches
Mail list logo