Re: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-21 Thread Phil Mayers
Brooks, Kyle wrote: Put a test user in the "users" file: testCleartest-Password := "blah", MS-CHAP-Use-NTLM-Auth := 0 TTLS/MSCHAPV2 works! If that still fails, then there's something wrong with the system that breaks the server in 2.0.5. Running Samba 3.2.0 on Fedora 9 Samba 3.0.28

RE: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-21 Thread Brooks, Kyle
>Put a test user in the "users" file: >test Cleartest-Password := "blah", MS-CHAP-Use-NTLM-Auth := 0 TTLS/MSCHAPV2 works! STA 02:00:00:00:00:01: Received RADIUS packet matched with a pending request, round trip time 0.00 sec RADIUS packet matching with station MS-MPPE-Send-Key (sign) - hexdump(

Re: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-21 Thread Phil Mayers
Perhaps try it with a Cleartext-Password in the "users" file. i.e. *Without* using ntlm_auth. That works for me, including with eapol_test, and TTLS/EAP-MSCHAPv2. Can you clarify this setup/change to test? I was pretty sure I needed to use ntlm_auth to auth against AD to test mschapv2 Put

RE: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-20 Thread Brooks, Kyle
Here we go, TTLS/PAP works STA 02:00:00:00:00:01: Received RADIUS packet matched with a pending request, round trip time 0.00 sec RADIUS packet matching with station MS-MPPE-Send-Key (sign) - hexdump(len=32): c5 bd 3a 25 91 1b fa 82 01 4c d2 d3 0f 50 b9 69 57 32 5c 19 73 03 2a 02 d2 47 36 bd 0d 7

Re: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-20 Thread Alan DeKok
Brooks, Kyle wrote: > I have run the test as recommended and attached the results. eapol_test > does fail ... > EAP-MSCHAPV2: Invalid authenticator response in success request That's pretty definitive. Hmm... it means that the MSCHAP-Success attribute sent by the server is wrong. Perhaps

Re: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-18 Thread Alan DeKok
Brooks, Kyle wrote: > I copied the exact same certificates (private, certificate_file and > cacert) from production to the new box with no change That's a little surprising. > I will do some more reading of what I can find then if no success I > guess give up. Please try 2.0.5, with the cert

RE: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-18 Thread Brooks, Kyle
>> There might be a slight miscommunication here these are two separate >> boxes. Our production box is 1.1.7 and this new box 2.0.5 > > That's nice. > > Do the clients have the certificate for the CA that signed the server certificate? It seems not. The clients have the certificate for the CA

Re: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-18 Thread Alan DeKok
Brooks, Kyle wrote: > There might be a slight miscommunication here these are two separate > boxes. Our production box is 1.1.7 and this new box 2.0.5 That's nice. Do the clients have the certificate for the CA that signed the server certificate? It seems not. > I have created the certifica

RE: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-18 Thread Brooks, Kyle
Hi Alan, There might be a slight miscommunication here these are two separate boxes. Our production box is 1.1.7 and this new box 2.0.5 I have created the certificates using your scripts or openssl and have had them signed by our Windows CA. The appropriate OID's are there according to the certi

Re: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-18 Thread Alan DeKok
Brooks, Kyle wrote: > Sorry to bother you again, but can you provide any more insight with > reference to the conf and debug files? Uh... what do you mean? The eap.conf file points to the certificates. It hasn't really changed from 1.1.7 to 2.0.5. Just make sure the eap.conf in 2.0.5 points

RE: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-18 Thread Brooks, Kyle
> If the server sends an Access-Challenge, and nothing else happens, the >user's machine is *choosing* to not continue the conversation. > > XP and Linux machines are known to work with 2.0.5. If 1.1.7 works >for you, and 2.0.5 doesn't, it's *very* likely because the >configurations are differen

Re: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-15 Thread Alan DeKok
Brooks, Kyle wrote: >> I will debug the switch but would it be something else? If the server sends an Access-Challenge, and nothing else happens, the user's machine is *choosing* to not continue the conversation. XP and Linux machines are known to work with 2.0.5. If 1.1.7 works for you, and

RE: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-15 Thread Brooks, Kyle
>>>++[mschap] returns ok >>>MSCHAP Success >>>++[eap] returns handled >> >>Radius is doing fine. Your switch is having problems with EAP-MSCHAPv2. >>Debug the switch. >> >>Ivan Kalik >>Kalik Informatika ISP > >Ok, but we are using this same switch and config for our current >deployment of freeradiu

RE: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-14 Thread Brooks, Kyle
>you've configured inner-tunnel for EAP - but do you have the inner-tunnel virtual server config file living >in sites-enabled/ ? Hello Alan, Here are the contents of the inner-tunnel file located in sites-enabled/ # -*- text -*- ##

Re: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-14 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
hi, you've configured inner-tunnel for EAP - but do you have the inner-tunnel virtual server config file living in sites-enabled/ ? alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

RE: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-14 Thread Brooks, Kyle
>>++[mschap] returns ok >>MSCHAP Success >>++[eap] returns handled > >Radius is doing fine. Your switch is having problems with EAP-MSCHAPv2. >Debug the switch. > >Ivan Kalik >Kalik Informatika ISP Ok, but we are using this same switch and config for our current deployment of freeradius 1.1.7 with

Re: FreeRadius 2.0.5 AD PEAP

2008-08-14 Thread Ivan Kalik
>++[mschap] returns ok >MSCHAP Success >++[eap] returns handled Radius is doing fine. Your switch is having problems with EAP-MSCHAPv2. Debug the switch. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html