Re: Freeradius vs. ActiveDirectory

2005-11-14 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, I hope, I could help some people trying to use AD for radius. there is another way - use the krb module to authenticate against AD alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

RE: Freeradius vs. ActiveDirectory

2005-11-14 Thread Jonathan De Graeve
Title: Nachricht What about the password? I thought this was a kerberos one and didnt reside into the ldap itself? -- Jonathan De Graeve Network/System Administrator Imelda vzw Informatica Dienst 015/50.52.98 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Always read the manual for the correct way

Re: Freeradius vs. ActiveDirectory

2005-11-14 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, Are there any advantages/ disadvantages ldap - krb5? LDAP advantage is that you can get more information out of the AD...which is what io believe is the desire in this case alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Freeradius vs. ActiveDirectory

2005-11-14 Thread Alan DeKok
=?iso-8859-1?Q?V=F6lker=2C_Christian?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My freeradius (1.0.1-1.RHEL3) authenticates again our ActiveDirectory (on 2003 Server). Without ntlm_auth! This is done via simple LDAP bind, which AD supports. It works for PAP authentication. It doesn't work for CHAP,