While MS ISA is fine for very small deployments it cannot scale very well in my
experience. While FR scales extremely well.
While MS ISA will start to really putter out at about 50-100 NASs (depending on
your hardware) FR will happily hum along with THOUSANDS of NASs.
Jake Sallee
Network
Sallee, Stephen (Jake) wrote:
While MS ISA will start to really putter out at about 50-100 NASs
(depending on your hardware) FR will happily hum along with THOUSANDS
of NASs.
I've done tests with 500,000 clients in the clients.conf file. The
server uses a fair bit of RAM, but performance
Raheel Itrat wrote:
I have installed a freeradius machine on ubuntu server, now my boss
wants me to integrate it with the Active directory so that the users can
be authenticated through it. I was wondering design wise does it make
sense to have a free radius server in between if we can run
:54 +0100
From: al...@deployingradius.com
To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Subject: Re: Radius Integration with Active Directory
Sallee, Stephen (Jake) wrote:
While MS ISA will start to really putter out at about 50-100 NASs
(depending on your hardware) FR will happily hum along
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Raheel Itrat raheel...@hotmail.com wrote:
Alright thats from performance point of view, but if we integrate it with
Active Directory then wouldn't that be a security issue to use protocol like
NTLM?.
Why would it be security issue?
No clear-text password would
5 matches
Mail list logo
