RE: Radiusd -X start vs Radiusd start

2007-11-06 Thread J-P Raymond
Set "reject_delay" = 0 was my problem ! Thanks for your answer Alan > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 00:35:14 +0100start vs Radiusd start> > > > When I : > radiusd -X start the process work fine> > > > When I : radiusd start the > process times out ???> > Set "reject_delay = 0".> > It's fixed in 2.0-pr

Re: Radiusd -X start vs Radiusd start

2007-11-02 Thread Alan DeKok
J-P Raymond wrote: > This soft attempt to validate a user called Whistle Blower and > freeradius must send a deny packet ! > > When I : radiusd -X start the process work fine > > When I : radiusd start the process times out ??? Set "reject_delay = 0". It's fixed in 2.0-pre, but it should

Re: Radiusd -X start vs Radiusd start

2007-11-02 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, > > Hi evr, > > I'm currently experimenting on freeradius 1.1.6 (on rhl3) my setup seams to > be working fine except a little bug ! > > I'm using a software to monitor freeradius from the outside this soft is > called (Whistle Blower running on a mac) > > This soft attempt to validat