Re: "Shared secret is incorrect" - but it is identical!

2007-07-06 Thread ken
Alan DeKok wrote: > (1) The shared secret is wrong > (2) The code is buggy > > There are no alternatives. > > This is often due to broken MD5 libraries, or 32/64-bit issues. But > FreeRADIUS hasn't had those kind of bugs for *years*. Yep, you were right, there must be some corruption

Re: "Shared secret is incorrect" - but it is identical!

2007-07-05 Thread ken
Alan DeKok wrote: > (1) The shared secret is wrong > (2) The code is buggy > > There are no alternatives. > > This is often due to broken MD5 libraries, or 32/64-bit issues. But > FreeRADIUS hasn't had those kind of bugs for *years*. I suspect you may well be right. Upgrading FC6 hasn

Re: "Shared secret is incorrect" - but it is identical!

2007-07-04 Thread Alan DeKok
ken wrote: ... > User-Password = "\356za\360V\202oljug\263\025M!)" (1) The shared secret is wrong (2) The code is buggy There are no alternatives. This is often due to broken MD5 libraries, or 32/64-bit issues. But FreeRADIUS hasn't had those kind of bugs for *years*. Alan D

Re: "Shared secret is incorrect" - but it is identical!

2007-07-04 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, > I acan make ntlm_auth work from command line but not from > FreeRadius yet - so I dropped it and am trying to ensure I can > run a minimal test. permissions. make sure that /var/cache/samba/winbind_priviledged is owned by freeradius or the freeradius group. alan - List info/subscribe/un

Re: "Shared secret is incorrect" - but it is identical!

2007-07-04 Thread ken
Edvin Seferovic wrote: > Does this have anything to do with the authentication method and AD ? I > don't think so. Neither do I! We're not looking at AD yet. A colleague of mine tried to set it up for JRS by roughly copying someone else's configuration. It failed. So I reinstalled FreeRadius a

Re: "Shared secret is incorrect" - but it is identical!

2007-07-04 Thread ken
Josh Howlett wrote: > What happens if, using radtest, you specify the username *without* the > realm from the remote machine? It fails just the same way It fails whether user is in /etc/passwd or /etc/raddb/users It fails whether "Auth := local" is in there or not It fails whether I check for

RE: "Shared secret is incorrect" - but it is identical!

2007-07-03 Thread Edvin Seferovic
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] g] On Behalf Of Josh Howlett Sent: Dienstag, 03. Juli 2007 23:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeRadius users mailing list Cc: Josh Howlett Subject: RE: "Shared secret is incorrect" - but it is identical! Hi Ken, What happens if, using radtest, you spec

RE: "Shared secret is incorrect" - but it is identical!

2007-07-03 Thread Josh Howlett
Hi Ken, What happens if, using radtest, you specify the username *without* the realm from the remote machine? josh. > -Original Message- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > us.org > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] freeradius.org] On Behalf Of ken > Sent: 03 July 2007 22:02 > To: FreeRadius users