Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-26 Thread Dirk van der Walt
Not really a bug, but I feel I should report it if someone else run into the same issue. On Ubuntu 10.4 (Lucid) when I try to build debs from the 2.1.11 source using the instructions on the Wiki, ( http://wiki.freeradius.org/Build#Building+Debian+packages

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-26 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Dirk van der Walt dirkvanderw...@gmail.com wrote: Not really a bug, but I feel I should report it if someone else run into the same issue. On Ubuntu 10.4 (Lucid) when I try to build debs from the 2.1.11 source using the instructions on the Wiki, (  

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-23 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:48 AM, John Dennis jden...@redhat.com wrote: freeradius-2.1.11 RPM packages for Fedora 14 and Fedora 15 have been pushed into their respective *testing* repos. It may take a while for them to hit the mirrors. To upgrade via yum you will need to enable the testing

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-23 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:48 AM, John Dennis jden...@redhat.com wrote: freeradius-2.1.11 RPM packages for Fedora 14 and Fedora 15 have been pushed into their respective *testing* repos. It may take a while for them to hit the mirrors. To upgrade via yum you will need to enable the

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-23 Thread John Dennis
On 06/23/2011 03:11 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:48 AM, John Dennisjden...@redhat.com wrote: freeradius-2.1.11 RPM packages for Fedora 14 and Fedora 15 have been pushed into their respective *testing* repos. It may take a while for them to hit the mirrors. To upgrade

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-22 Thread Alan DeKok
John Dennis wrote: The bootstrap logic has been changed, the comment in eap.conf says: ... Maybe I'm missing something but it seems pointless to have certificate validation logic in the bootstrap command if it's only run in debug and and only if the cert doesn't exist. It also seems to

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-22 Thread John Dennis
freeradius-2.1.11 RPM packages for Fedora 14 and Fedora 15 have been pushed into their respective *testing* repos. It may take a while for them to hit the mirrors. To upgrade via yum you will need to enable the testing repo, e.g. yum --enablerepo=fedora-updates-testing upgrade freeradius --

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-21 Thread Stefan Winter
Hi, a similar issue with the config parser here... The following worked nicely in 2.1.10, but barks with Unexpected text else (and with the obvious change to elsif, Unexpected text elsif). if ( %{NAS-Identifier} == ejabberd ) { update request {

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-21 Thread Alan DeKok
Stefan Winter wrote: a similar issue with the config parser here... The following worked nicely in 2.1.10, but barks with Unexpected text else (and with the obvious change to elsif, Unexpected text elsif). if ( %{NAS-Identifier} == ejabberd ) { update request {

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-21 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
man unlang :) Everything needs to go on its own line: if (...) { ... } elsif (...) { ... } Using } elseif won't work. The elsif will *always* be ignored. Yes... that's always been the syntax, it's a line based parser. All

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-21 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, Hi, a similar issue with the config parser here... The following worked nicely in 2.1.10, but barks with Unexpected text else (and with the obvious change to elsif, Unexpected text elsif). if ( %{NAS-Identifier} == ejabberd ) { update request {

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-21 Thread Stefan Winter
Hello Alan, all, thanks for that quick lesson :-) I stand corrected; and with the right ordering, things are now working as they should. I did wonder a few times why that attribute RESTENA-Service-Type wasn't properly populated in some cases :-) But no bad things happened, just things being

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-21 Thread John Dennis
The bootstrap logic has been changed, the comment in eap.conf says: # This command creates the initial snake oil # certificates when the server is run as root, # and via radiusd -X. # # As of 2.1.11, it *also* checks the server # certificate for validity, including expiration. # This means that

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-20 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, It's been a long time since 2.1.10. We're happy to release version 2.1.11, which has many of useful new features, and a number of minor bugs fixed. yay! :-) virtual champagne cork released however, a nice quirky change in config parser means that any unlang style code with an 'if'

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-20 Thread Alan DeKok
Alan Buxey wrote: however, a nice quirky change in config parser means that any unlang style code with an 'if' condition check that end with no space before curlies eg Arg. That's annoying. It would have been nice to catch that. Anyways, the fix is simple. At least there's a

RE: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-20 Thread Gary Gatten
, 2011 10:00 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released Alan Buxey wrote: however, a nice quirky change in config parser means that any unlang style code with an 'if' condition check that end with no space before curlies eg Arg. That's annoying

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-20 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, Arg. That's annoying. It would have been nice to catch that. it must have gone in pretty late as we didnt have an issue with 2.1.11 GIT release on our test server (which is now running 3.0.0 GIT for some REAL testing ;-) ) alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

Re: Version 2.1.11 has been released

2011-06-20 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, Fix it real quick before many download it, call it 2.1.11.1 - or 2.1.11a :) if its to be changed then 2.1.12 and at least change the old year in src/main/version.c there are other date copyright files - i guess the authors should assert this but the main project should cover