Tariq Rashid wrote:
> hi, i'm planning a significant migration from a different radius
> server (Radiator, perl based).
You might have a look at the rlm_perl module (persistent perl module to
intervene in multiple stages).
It's not marked stable yet, but it should be soon and it should be working
Tariq Rashid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi, i'm planning a significant migration from a different radius server
> (Radiator, perl based).
That's good to hear!
> our tests with freeradius show a much lighter server - its faster, and
> easier on memory and cpu. however the downside is that app
ist
Subject: Re: best place for logic - users file or custom module?
Tariq Rashid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi, i'm planning a significant migration from a different radius server
> (Radiator, perl based).
That's good to hear!
> our tests with freeradius show
Tariq Rashid wrote:
> i'd like some advide on the best place to implement this logic. for example
> - a common scenario is for a request to come from A, and the reply to A
> contains instructions to extend a tunnel to a second device B. A second
> query from B is then received.
Use huntgroups to
Tariq Rashid wrote:
> is python more stable than the support for perl? i have much more
> experience in python than perl.
rlm_python is not marked stable yet either.
I don't know about it's stability, but I haven't seen much about rlm_python
on the maillist, so maybe support could be very low;
>
Tariq Rashid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is python more stable than the support for perl? i have much more experience
> in python than perl.
See bugs.freeradius.org for an updated python module. There's been
no feedback about it, so I'm leery of adding it in until people say it
works.
> also
6 matches
Mail list logo
