RE: Question: How do I forcibly accept all rest requests??

2010-03-30 Thread Difan Zhao
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+difan.zhao=guest-tek@lists.freeradi us.org] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:47 PM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Question: How do I forcibly accept all rest requests?? Difan Zhao wrote: However if you can fool the NAS to let

Re: question on users file

2010-03-25 Thread John Dennis
On 03/25/2010 12:31 PM, Jeffrey Wang wrote: I am using freeradius server against my ldap server for regular user access and eap. I need the wireless user treated differently. So I created a entry in users file and would like to set user-password for these users in encrypted form. For the users

RE: question on users file

2010-03-25 Thread Jeffrey Wang
LDAP. However, once cleartext-password set, user-password is ignored. Jeff -Original Message- From: John Dennis [mailto:jden...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:36 PM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Cc: Jeffrey Wang Subject: Re: question on users file On 03/25/2010 12:31 PM

Re: Question on processing delayed proxy packets

2009-12-11 Thread Alan DeKok
Patric wrote: As you can see, the above query will set acct_input_octets = 5 on server B, so now server A has acct_input_octets = 7 and server B has acct_input_octets = 5. Yup. Most people solve this problem by doing post-processing of the tables. If a db entry exists, and the

Re: question about scalability

2009-11-23 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Montag, 23. November 2009 11:19:41 schrieb Divya Shah: How many radius accounting requests per second can free radius support? I am using openser-1.1.1-1.1 . I have tested up to around 400. But need it to support more than 600 requests per sec. Please let me know the max rate it can

Re: Question About rlm_sql_log (it was Re: Time connected)

2009-11-03 Thread Ivan Kalik
Sorry for the stupid question, but I'd want to get how many time every user is connected, please could you provide some kind of guideliness? Using Version 2.1.1. SELECT Count(*) FROM radacct WHERE UserName='some_username' I guess that you're using database module, aren't you? You

Re: Question About rlm_sql_log (it was Re: Time connected)

2009-11-03 Thread Sergio Belkin
2009/11/3 Ivan Kalik t...@kalik.net: Sorry for the stupid question, but I'd want to get how many time every user is connected, please could you provide some kind of guideliness? Using Version 2.1.1. SELECT Count(*) FROM radacct WHERE UserName='some_username' I guess that you're using

Re: Question about Max-All-Session vs. Expiration attributes

2009-10-20 Thread Ivan Kalik
We sell our time in Day, Week and Month increments, and the users are free to used the system as much as they want during their time. My Question is, do I really need to use Max-All-Session if all I really need is a hard expiration date for my users? You don't need Max-All-Session then.

RE: Question regarding retrying of requests in detail-combined file

2009-10-15 Thread Tim Sylvester
Add this line to the home server configuration of Server A (running 2.1.7): no_response_fail = yes Tim -Original Message- From: freeradius-users- bounces+tim.sylvester=networkradius@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-

Re: Question regarding retrying of requests in detail-combined file

2009-10-15 Thread Patric
Tim Sylvester wrote: Add this line to the home server configuration of Server A (running 2.1.7): no_response_fail = yes Hi Tim, That worked perfectly! Thank you :) Rejecting request 191 (proxy Id 218) due to lack of any response from home server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port 1813 No response

Re: Question regarding retrying of requests in detail-combined file

2009-10-15 Thread Alan DeKok
Patric wrote: And 30 seconds later the request is retried and succeeds :) Is there any way for me to decrease the retry delay? See the retry_interval configuration in the detail listener. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Question regarding retrying of requests in detail-combined file

2009-10-15 Thread Patric
Alan DeKok wrote: Patric wrote: And 30 seconds later the request is retried and succeeds :) Is there any way for me to decrease the retry delay? See the retry_interval configuration in the detail listener. Hi Alan, Would I be correct in my understanding that I add that here:

Re: Question about outer identity

2009-07-31 Thread Martin Pauly
Hi Alan, Replace the ldap123 line in the authorize seciton with: if (!EAP-Message) { ldap123 } works great and is logical indeed -- thanks! Just for myself and others try to learn from examples: I had thought that eap { ok = return

Re: Question about outer identity

2009-07-30 Thread Alan DeKok
Martin Pauly wrote: I have 2.1.6 and things basically work. But I just came across a question about the processing of outer/inner identity: As I understand it, in case of a non-EAP RADIUS request (eg from my old modem servers), there is no tunnel and hence no inner identity. == Autz and Auth

Re: Question about outer identity

2009-07-30 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, I have 2.1.6 and things basically work. But I just came across a question about the processing of outer/inner identity: As I understand it, in case of a non-EAP RADIUS request (eg from my old modem servers), there is no tunnel and hence no inner identity. == Autz and Auth are done by

Re: question about freeradius vs AA(ldap) and A(mysql)

2009-07-16 Thread Ivan Kalik
My question is how can i change the usergroup, radgroupcheck, radgroupreply, tables into Ldap to authorization-authentication step, with more options to check like Calling-Station-Id, Called-Station-Id, Hint, Groupnames, etc etc??? Place user into a group in ldap and use Ldap-Group to check

Re: question about freeradius vs AA(ldap) and A(mysql)

2009-07-15 Thread Tony P.
ok i found this http://freeradius.org/radiusd/doc/ldap_howto.txt i guess to have many stuff to read and try my problem any way i can read more solutions to can make my trouble in fast way and short time. Regards again. Tony Tony P. escribió: hi, i have freeradius server over Debian Etch

Re: Question on proxying requests

2009-06-07 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, Or maybe ntlm_auth isnt the way to do this? Maybe I'm looking at this the wrong way? Any ideas to get this to work or any other better ideas? there are samba issues to dea with - binding credentials etc with regards to ntlm_auth, you can put an unlang wrapper around it to choose what

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-29 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
Problem was solved thanks to Ivan assistance, Main problem was on switch side and its configuration, Second problem was - proper certificate to proper certificate store And third - in my head :). Thank you again Bartosz. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-29 Thread Ivan Kalik
Problem was solved thanks to Ivan assistance, Main problem was on switch side and its configuration, Second problem was - proper certificate to proper certificate store And third - in my head :). OK. Now that you have established that client certificates signed by CA work with XP SP3, can you

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-29 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Ivan Kalik t...@kalik.net wrote: Problem was solved thanks to Ivan assistance, Main problem was on switch side and its configuration, Second problem was - proper certificate to proper certificate store And third - in my head :). OK. Now that you have

Re: question about session resumption and reply attributes

2009-05-28 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 21/5/09 15:05, Alan DeKok wrote: Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: Yes, so have it tell the outer server... Insert the (attached) snippet into the authorize section of the inner server. $ git format-patch ? It's on my to do list. You may find things getting jiggled around to a more sane

Re: question about session resumption and reply attributes

2009-05-22 Thread Anatoli Logvinski
Thanks a lot guys, it's working properly now Best regards Anatoli Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: Hi, No. You should be running through your authorisation policies on session resumption. All policies should be moved to the post-auth section of the outer server. but only the inner

Re: question about session resumption and reply attributes

2009-05-21 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anatoli Logvinski wrote: Hi We are using dynamic VLAN assignment with freeradius 2.1.6 and tried to test session resumption. It looks like that freeradius doesn't cache all reply attributes and upon session resumption the VLAN assignment

Re: question about session resumption and reply attributes

2009-05-21 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, No. You should be running through your authorisation policies on session resumption. All policies should be moved to the post-auth section of the outer server. but only the inner server knows the real id etc ? alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

Re: question about session resumption and reply attributes

2009-05-21 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
Hi, No. You should be running through your authorisation policies on session resumption. All policies should be moved to the post-auth section of the outer server. but only the inner server knows the real id etc ? Yes, so have it tell the outer server... Insert the (attached)

Re: question about session resumption and reply attributes

2009-05-21 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: Hi, No. You should be running through your authorisation policies on session resumption. All policies should be moved to the post-auth section of the outer server. but only the inner server knows the real id etc ?

Re: question about session resumption and reply attributes

2009-05-21 Thread Alan DeKok
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: Yes, so have it tell the outer server... Insert the (attached) snippet into the authorize section of the inner server. $ git format-patch ? I believe the User-Name attribute in outer.reply is cached, and available for use on session resumption. Yes. Once

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
Don't strip the username. Why do you proxy this anyway? Create it as a local realm: I am using basic configuration without changes in config cause: so..somewhere along the line you are playing with the User-Name attribute...something which you cannot do with EAP - if you take a standard 2.1.6

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Alan DeKok
Bartosz Chodzinski wrote: make the basic changes to your eap.conf and client.conf it will work it wont. You can believe that, which means that everyone else is lying. They just download the software, follow the guides, and it just works. But... because it doesn't work for you, they must be

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
could you give me good freeradius guide for dummies - I think I need it :) On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.comwrote: Bartosz Chodzinski wrote: make the basic changes to your eap.conf and client.conf it will work it wont. You can believe that, which

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, realm example.com { } realm LOCAL { } realm NULL { } /etc/freeradius/proxy.conf[498]: home_server localhost does not exist thats very interesting - because in the default proxy.conf there IS an entry for home_server localhost. so, I'll repeat once again, do not just randomly

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Alan DeKok
Bartosz Chodzinski wrote: could you give me good freeradius guide for dummies - I think I need it :) $ man radiusd It contains a section describing how to make changes to the configuration files. For EAP, see http://deployingradius.com The front page contains 4 steps to get EAP working.

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
Hey People!, I am not saying that you are lying, I even didnt think like that, I never intend to insult you, for god sake, I am asking for help - that mean that you are the masters and I am the student yes, it annyoing me - I start to do something with radius cause I felt that is good idea to know

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Alan DeKok
Bartosz Chodzinski wrote: I am not saying that you are lying, I even didnt think like that, I never intend to insult you, You're not insulting us. I am asking you to *think* about what you are saying. yes, it annyoing me - I start to do something with radius cause I felt that is good idea

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Ivan Kalik
could you give me good freeradius guide for dummies - I think I need it :) Guide: don't make any changes to the default configuration unless you know what you are doing. That's it. Server is configured by default to handle EAP-TLS. There is nothing that you need to do to make it happen. Now,

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
back to the begining and using the most simple conf. to be sure that I have clear configuration #apt-get remove freeradius #dpkg -P freeradius #dpkg -i freeradius_2.1.6-0_i386.deb server is Debian etchnhalf, it is virtual server on VMware ESX Server 3i, 3.5.0 now I have clear configuration and

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Alan DeKok
Bartosz Chodzinski wrote: back to the begining and using the most simple conf. ... now I have clear configuration and make simply changes changes: radiusd.conf proxy_requests = no #was yes, set to no cause I dont need it The guide didn't say to do that. ... I still have a problem -

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Ivan Kalik
next I made client certificate (using standard scripts) #cd /etc/freeradius/certs #make client and install certificates client.p12, ca.der on Win Xp Prof Sp3 OEM, Acer Travel Mate 380 certificates installed in Trusted Root CA and Personal storages (I deleted all previous certs on that

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
The steps you took show that you are NOT following the guide. Good luck. You clearly are *not* interested in solving the problem. the guide in radiusd.conf says: #The server has proxying turned on by default. If your system is NOT # set up to proxy requests to another server, then you can

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Ivan Kalik
The steps you took show that you are NOT following the guide. Good luck. You clearly are *not* interested in solving the problem. the guide in radiusd.conf says: #The server has proxying turned on by default. If your system is NOT # set up to proxy requests to another server, then you

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
ok I changed it to default proxy_requests = yes $INCLUDE proxy.conf /etc/freeradius/certs/Makefile was #client.crt: client.csr server.crt server.key index.txt serial # openssl ca -batch -keyfile server.key -cert server.crt -in client.csr -key $(PASSWORD_SERVER) -out client.crt -extensions

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
I am using a standard settings of eap.conf when I change eap.conf to: # default_eap_type = md5 default_eap_type = peap I have similar communicate Ready to process requests. rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 192.168.5.206 port 1812, id=242, length=147

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-20 Thread Ivan Kalik
Check connection settings on Windows machine. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP I am using a standard settings of eap.conf when I change eap.conf to: # default_eap_type = md5 default_eap_type = peap That's not Windows machine - that's on your radius server.

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-19 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
so..somewhere along the line you are playing with the User-Name attribute...something which you cannot do with EAP - if you take a standard 2.1.6 install and make the basic changes to your eap.conf and clients.conf it will work. which Linux distribution should I use? So far I tryied

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-19 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, which Linux distribution should I use? So far I tryied debian-etchnhalf, or CentOS, and in every How to its written that I have to compile it by mysefl. This how to didnt work anyway... so I will try what you will suggest. Bartosz. theres nothing wrong with compiling it yourself - so

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-19 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
Ok, I downloaded 2.1.6 # unp freeradius-server-2.1.6.tar.gz # cd /usr/src/freeradius-server-2.1.6 # dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us # dpkg -i freeradius_2.1.6-0_i386.deb - instalator create ca and server certs in /etc/freeradius/certs directory # cd /etc/freeradius/certs # make client next

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-19 Thread Ivan Kalik
# make client next I made a copy of ca.der and client.p12 to xp directory, next I opened mmc and install both of them to Trusted Root Certificate Authorities and to Personal exclamation mark on client certificate: windows does not have enough information to verify this certificate you

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-19 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
So in other words this script is for all clients exept microsofts-like ? You should try altering make client command in Makefile so that client certificates are signed by ca and not server certificate. do you have such altered makefile? On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Ivan Kalik t...@kalik.net

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-19 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
I created once again certs by myself, giving common name for user cert the same like in example u...@example.com, I place them on xp client - both of them looks ok, now something is happening (anyway like Aragorn said: still not king): Ready to process requests. rad_recv: Access-Request packet

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-19 Thread Ivan Kalik
I created once again certs by myself, giving common name for user cert the same like in example u...@example.com, I place them on xp client - both of them looks ok, now something is happening (anyway like Aragorn said: still not king): Ready to process requests. rad_recv: Access-Request

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-18 Thread Alan DeKok
Bartosz Chodzinski wrote: /etc/freeradius/certs/README I've never understood why people think it's useful to post documentation from the server on this list. Do you think we haven't seen it? and something happend: ( I think key information is TLS_accept:error in SSLv3 read client

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-18 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
ok (you guys propably hate me :) but please could you still give me the answers as you did before) but back to the subject: I did like you said, I installed 2.0.4 version (compiled using suggestions from: http://www.fatofthelan.com/articles/articles.php?pid=27

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-18 Thread Ivan Kalik
I installed 2.0.4 version (compiled using suggestions from: http://www.fatofthelan.com/articles/articles.php?pid=27 http://www.linuxinsight.com/building-debian-freeradius-package-with-eap-tls-ttls-peap-support.html) If you downloaded current version, you wouldn't need to ask. You have to

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-18 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, ok (you guys propably hate me :) but please could you still give me the answers as you did before) but back to the subject: I did like you said, I installed 2.0.4 version (compiled using suggestions from: http://www.fatofthelan.com/articles/articles.php?pid=27

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-15 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
I tryied yesterday many times using diferent options but it doesnt work, any idea what can be wrong? Bartosz. On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Bartosz Chodzinski bartos...@gmail.comwrote: ok full information: jpg with all setting on the not working client

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-15 Thread Ivan Kalik
I tryied yesterday many times using diferent options but it doesnt work, any idea what can be wrong? Looking at this: http://w573.wrzuta.pl/obraz/powieksz/ag0ldvKR8Zj you have put ca (ca_auth), not client certificate in the personal store. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP - List

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-15 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
Thank you for answer. I put this to personal store, I think it is a client certificate, I gave a commonName ca_auth Certificate: Data: Version: 3 (0x2) Serial Number: 99:61:67:27:8b:7d:0a:b1 Signature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryption Issuer: C=PL,

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-15 Thread Ivan Kalik
Thank you for answer. I put this to personal store, I think it is a client certificate, I gave a commonName ca_auth .. Issuer: C=PL, ST=dolnoslaskie, O=firma, OU=firma, CN=ca_auth/emailaddress=em...@address.pl ... Subject: C=PL, ST=dolnoslaskie, O=firma, OU=firma,

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-15 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
tls { private_key_file = /etc/freeradius/eap/newkey.pem certificate_file = /etc/freeradius/eap/newcert.pem CA_file = /etc/freeradius/eap/eapCA/cacert.pem dh_file = /etc/freeradius/eap/dh random_file = /etc/freeradius/eap/random fragment_size = 1024

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-15 Thread Ivan Kalik
tls { private_key_file = /etc/freeradius/eap/newkey.pem certificate_file = /etc/freeradius/eap/newcert.pem CA_file = /etc/freeradius/eap/eapCA/cacert.pem dh_file = /etc/freeradius/eap/dh random_file = /etc/freeradius/eap/random fragment_size = 1024

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-15 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
Thanks, I created certificate openssl req -new -keyout /etc/freeradius/eap/client_key.pem -out /etc/freeradius/eap/client_req.pem -days 730 -passin pass:password -passout pass:password openssl ca -config /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf -policy policy_anything -out /etc/freeradius/eap/client_cert.pem

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-15 Thread Ivan Kalik
And I put cliet_cert.pem to both certificate stores Trusted CA and Personal You should import .p12 version onto the client. Are you sure that I should not change anything in my server config files Any particular reason you are creating certificates yourself? Why aren't you using scripts

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-14 Thread Ivan Kalik
I have freeradius with eap support on debian etch, radius v1.1.3 2.0.4 should be available for Debian. Upgrade. Vista doesn't work with 1.1.3. And you will have problems with XP SP3. everthing working fine but I'd like to have much more simple configuration only by certificate and nothing

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-14 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
2.0.4 should be available for Debian. I know, 2.0.4 freeradius is available for debian lenny but not etch unfortunately. 2. Use EAP-TLS to connect (Smart card or certificate in Windows speak). Could you write me where in config put that? I tried described below but it doesnt work eap.conf:

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-14 Thread Ivan Kalik
2.0.4 should be available for Debian. I know, 2.0.4 freeradius is available for debian lenny but not etch unfortunately. http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=freeradius 2. Use EAP-TLS to connect (Smart card or certificate in Windows speak). Could you write me where in config put that?

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-14 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
What doesn't work? Post the debug. server: I dont change in my config file, is the same like in first message, client (win xp): I have local connection-authentication-method-eap(peap)-properties: validate server cert (marked checkbox), marked cacert.pem, secured password eap-mschapv2 -

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-14 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
I am sorry, I gave you wrong debug, whatever is marked or unmarked on checkbox local connection-authentication-keep in memory information about users for aditional network connection server does not have any new lines in debug, like nothing happend at all. On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:24 PM,

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-14 Thread Ivan Kalik
What doesn't work? Post the debug. server: I dont change in my config file, is the same like in first message, client (win xp): I have local connection-authentication-method-eap(peap)-properties: validate server cert (marked checkbox), marked cacert.pem, secured password

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-14 Thread Ivan Kalik
I am sorry, I gave you wrong debug, whatever is marked or unmarked on checkbox local connection-authentication-keep in memory information about users for aditional network connection server does not have any new lines in debug, like nothing happend at all. It can't find client

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-14 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
ok full information: jpg with all setting on the not working client http://w573.wrzuta.pl/obraz/powieksz/ag0ldvKR8Zj I think it is properly, cause it work during eap (peap), am I wrong? Bartosz. On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Ivan Kalik t...@kalik.net wrote: I am sorry, I gave you wrong

Re: question about windows users

2009-05-14 Thread Bartosz Chodzinski
I know that date may be weird, but it doesnt matter debian-etch:~# date Sat May 14 15:46:10 CEST 2005 windows date may 2005, as well and switch as well, I forgot to check date when I created certificates, but afrer changing date in server and clietn it is not a problem Bartosz. On Thu, May 14,

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clientsusinganexternalprogram-A different case

2009-02-26 Thread Ali Majdzadeh
Ivan, Hello Thanks for your reply. I have got some questions to ask. We have different types of clients (Or, connections) in our system; Dial-Up, ADSL, VoIP, CHAP, MS-CHAP, MS-CHAPv2 and ... . Each of these clients need different authorization method. Now, where should our authorization code

Re: Question about authenticating CHAPclientsusinganexternalprogram-A different case

2009-02-26 Thread tnt
Thanks for your reply. I have got some questions to ask. We have different types of clients (Or, connections) in our system; Dial-Up, ADSL, VoIP, CHAP, MS-CHAP, MS-CHAPv2 and ... . Each of these clients need different authorization method. Now, where should our authorization code reside? Shall we

Re: Question about authenticating CHAPclientsusinganexternalprogram-A different case

2009-02-26 Thread Ali Majdzadeh
Ivan, Hello Thanks for your reply. Sorry if my question is elementary, but this is the last one. What is the difference between creating a customized module to do Authorization/Post-Authentication and using external programs as instances of rlm_exec module to the so-called functionalities? Kind

Re: Question about authenticating CHAPclientsusinganexternalprogram-Adifferent case

2009-02-26 Thread tnt
Thanks for your reply. Sorry if my question is elementary, but this is the last one. What is the difference between creating a customized module to do Authorization/Post-Authentication and using external programs as instances of rlm_exec module to the so-called functionalities? Module is much

Re: Question about authenticating CHAPclientsusinganexternalprogram-Adifferent case

2009-02-26 Thread Ali Majdzadeh
Ivan, Thanks for your reply. I think I should start writing my own module, because the AAA system itself is in C. In other words, all of our external programs are C programs. Thanks again for your patience and guidance. Kind Regards Ali Majdzadeh Kohbanani - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clients using an external program- A different case

2009-02-24 Thread Ali Majdzadeh
Ivan, Hello Thanks for your attention, but I have tested what you had suggested. The result is the same, with both attributes the CHAP module throws the same error. Any ideas? Kind Regards Ali Majdzadeh Kohbanani 2009/2/24 t...@kalik.net I am using freeradius-1.1.7. In order to authenticate

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clients using an externalprogram- A different case

2009-02-24 Thread tnt
The result is the same, with both attributes the CHAP module throws the same error. Any ideas? Post the debug. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clients using an externalprogram- A different case

2009-02-24 Thread Ali Majdzadeh
Ivan, Hello Problem solved. I have mentioned my solution below, but now comes another question, sorry :) How is it possible to authenticate CHAP clients using an external program and not the rlm_chap module? I made two instances of the rlm_exec module. One as the authorization external program and

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clients using anexternalprogram- A different case

2009-02-24 Thread tnt
By the way, the authorization external program sets my customized Auth-Type so that in the authentication section, I can use it to authenticate clients using my authentication external program which is another instance of the rlm_exec module (the second one). Why? The main problem is the way

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clients using anexternalprogram- A different case

2009-02-24 Thread Ali Majdzadeh
Ivan, Hello Thanks for your reply. You are right and I do know that this is not the right way to get things done, but what we have got here is a sophisticated and feature-balloted AAA system which is totally based on external programs. As a mid-term solution we should try to respond to our

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clients usinganexternalprogram- A different case

2009-02-24 Thread tnt
Thanks for your reply. You are right and I do know that this is not the right way to get things done, but what we have got here is a sophisticated and feature-balloted AAA system which is totally based on external programs. So what would be the problem in sorting out your features in

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clients usinganexternalprogram- A different case

2009-02-24 Thread Ali Majdzadeh
Ivan, Thanks for your reply. The problem is time. We should find an immediate solution. Anyway, thanks again. Kind Regards Ali Majdzadeh Kohbanani - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clientsusinganexternalprogram- A different case

2009-02-24 Thread tnt
Thanks for your reply. The problem is time. We should find an immediate solution. Anyway, thanks again. Immediate solution is *not* trying to invent a new kind of hole on the flower pot. Don't use custom authentication script - use existing server modules. Whatever additional checks you think

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clientsusinganexternalprogram- A different case

2009-02-24 Thread Ali Majdzadeh
Ivan, Thanks for your attention. Yes, you are right, we should organize our system regarding the structure of freeradius. I have lots of questions to ask. I am going to coherently form them; would you please trace this thread? Kind Regards Ali Majdzadeh Kohbanani - List

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clientsusinganexternalprogram-A different case

2009-02-24 Thread tnt
Thanks for your attention. Yes, you are right, we should organize our system regarding the structure of freeradius. I have lots of questions to ask. I am going to coherently form them; would you please trace this thread? I do hang around. This is what you should plan for: - checks that need to

Re: Question about authenticating CHAP clients using an external program- A different case

2009-02-23 Thread tnt
I am using freeradius-1.1.7. In order to authenticate users using an external program, I have created an instance of the rlm_exec module which contains the properties of the external program. In the radiusd.conf, I have called the instance in the authentication section. Now, as I want to

Re: Question about authentication

2009-01-20 Thread Alan DeKok
John Baldwin wrote: I’m trying to configure freeradius on a Centos server to authenticate my logins on Cisco devices. I can see in the log file that my request is hitting the server. I’m advised to just add a username and password in the users file so I’ve done that, I’ve used the steve

Re: Question about the random file

2008-12-09 Thread Alan DeKok
Jason Wittlin-Cohen wrote: I'm currently using EAP-TLS with 3072 bit RSA certificates and a 3072 bit DH paramters. Currently I'm using the random file produced by the bootstrap script which appears to take 10 bytes of data from /dev/urandom. Is this sufficient with the larger keysize I am

Re: question

2008-11-24 Thread Alan DeKok
Jackson Jerry-NPC637 wrote: Hi - Summary - I want/need to configure free radius to allow a TLS user on to the system; without having To authenticate the certs? I am not sure if this is possible, but wanted to ask if there was a way to bypass TLS cert authentication. It's not possible

RE: question

2008-11-24 Thread Jackson Jerry-NPC637
, November 24, 2008 10:36 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: question Jackson Jerry-NPC637 wrote: Hi - Summary - I want/need to configure free radius to allow a TLS user on to the system; without having To authenticate the certs? I am not sure if this is possible, but wanted

Re: question

2008-11-24 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, Hi Alan - This is a wireless network. If you have a minute could you explain why this is different between `wireless' `wired' system? for wireless 802.1X the cert is used as part of the securing system to create keyed content to ensure the encryption of the data for wired 802.1X

Re: Question on implementing Vendor-Specific Attributes

2008-10-20 Thread A BlueCoder
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:09 AM, A BlueCoder [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi, I have a need to implement Vendor-Specific Attributes using a FreeRadius approach (version 0.9.3 on Solaris). I understand probably rewriting a rml module would solve this problem and probably the most effective

Re: Question on implementing Vendor-Specific Attributes

2008-10-20 Thread Alan DeKok
A BlueCoder wrote: Actually there are two attributes, and the values of attributes are not static - they vary based on the NAS-IDentifider attribute values. $ man unlang You can create attributes based on the value of other attributes. (I can set up VSA to send static values - just the

Re: Question about Logging

2008-08-25 Thread Aaron Spanik
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:04:11 +0200 Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaron Spanik wrote: *snip* I suggest getting access. Sorry... but it's the simplest way to debug things when something is going wrong. Always. But sometimes one is forced to prove something is wrong before the

Re: Question about Logging

2008-08-25 Thread Alan DeKok
Aaron Spanik wrote: As you no doubt know, once I used %{proxy-request:Packet-Dst-Ip-Address} I started seeing exactly what I wanted to see in my logs. Yup. That sounds excellent; I will check out the GIT version. Can you comment on how long it is likely to take before those features make

Re: Question about Logging

2008-08-22 Thread Alan DeKok
Aaron Spanik wrote: Recently, however, there has been reason to suspect that the two remote RADIUS servers are behaving inconsistently with each other (i.e. auth fails on one and then immediately succeeds on the other). Unfortunately, I have zero access to the remote RADIUS servers and

Re: Question regarding rlm_perl and Access-Challenge

2008-08-19 Thread Alan DeKok
Harry J Walsh wrote: I want to develop some test cases for a radius client I am developing and I would like to be able to use rlm_perl to simulate various scenarios. The one I am having major problems with is Access-Challenge. I really like rlm_perl and the flexibility it provides and I

Re: Question regarding rlm_perl and Access-Challenge

2008-08-19 Thread Harry J Walsh
Thanks for the swift reply Dekok. I tried what you suggested and it doesn't work. Looking at dictionary.freeradius.internal and double checking the values in the pair everything looks okay.I'm going to play about with this a bit, but in the mean time here's some more details and I would

<    1   2   3   4   >