Robin Mordasiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made a trip to my local bookstore and just read in the oreilly 802.11
book on building wireless infrastructure that I would need to use
Microsoft IAS. Is this false ?
Yes.
I think, though, at the time the book was written, machine
Oh, excellent. I just joined this list hoping to query the
members on finding more information on doing
wireless+activedirectory+freeradius,
unfortunately I could not find any good postings, or web
toots/examples.
Hi Robin, Welcome to the club.
I would need to use Microsoft IAS. Is
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, King, Michael wrote:
Oh, excellent. I just joined this list hoping to query the
members on finding more information on doing
wireless+activedirectory+freeradius,
unfortunately I could not find any good postings, or web
toots/examples.
Hi Robin, Welcome to the
Yes I too would like some help with this.
This what I am trying to do:
1. authenticate via chap (from chillispot) to freeradius, using unix shadow
passwords or pam..
I followed the pam directions and it works fine for pap, but not chap..
2. also, would like to get it to work via AD (kerberos
Laker Netman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure I understand. To my knowledge, currently our
AD doesn't contain any info that would differentiate a
wireless user from one who is wired. Based on the
authenticating NAS (which is identifiable as wired vs
wireless at least to RADIUS) how could I
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Alan DeKok wrote:
Laker Netman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're completely down the wrong path. AD is a database. It's a
directory. Using anonymous bind, there is very little data you can
get from it.
Stop talking about solutions, as you don't know how the
Alan DeKok wrote:
You choose which group you fall into. I don't have time to care
what you think about me.
I remember when I was very new to Linux. I had made an incredibly stupid
basic networking mistake and was trying to find out why a specific Linux
ethernet driver was acting up. The
Laker Netman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First: We do not allow anonymous binding to our AD
LDAP. So, for testing to date, I have used
Administrator and the associated password in the
config file. Obviously this is less than ideal :)
What is the best or better alternative? Allowing
anonymous
Comments below.
--- Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laker Netman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First: We do not allow anonymous binding to our AD
LDAP. So, for testing to date, I have used
Administrator and the associated password in the
config file. Obviously this is less than ideal :)
If I want to use WPA with TKIP (or preferably AES) do
I *have* to have a supplicant? Most hosts will be XP,
WPA uses TKIP
WPA2 uses AES
Both use 802.1x/EAP with whatever cocktail of options you convolute.
though there is a slim chance I may have to deal with
others.
Lastly, as I
10 matches
Mail list logo
