On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 7:49 PM, McNutt, Justin M. wrote:
> So my server admins did what they're supposed to do and ran "yum update" on
> everything last weekend. The updates included a refresh of the "freeradius2"
> packages that took FR from 2.1.7 to 2.1.12.
Is this on RHEL5?
If yes, I HIGHL
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 12:49:33PM +, McNutt, Justin M. wrote:
> This created a nasty problem. Now I have an
> /etc/raddb/modules/ldap and an /etc/raddb/modules/ldap.rpmnew,
> both of which define how "ldap { }" is supposed to work. Same
> thing happened to the mschap module.
...
> Ideas?
I
FreeRadius users mailing list
mailto:freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>>
Subject: Re: RHEL Patches Broke FreeRADIUS
McNutt, Justin M. wrote:
I'd like to tackle this from the FreeRADIUS side rather than by reconfiguring
rpm because I can think of other reasons why some idio^H^H^H
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 7:49 PM, McNutt, Justin M. wrote:
> So my server admins did what they're supposed to do and ran "yum update" on
> everything last weekend. The updates included a refresh of the "freeradius2"
> packages that took FR from 2.1.7 to 2.1.12.
>
> That's all fine and dandy, exce
McNutt, Justin M. wrote:
> I'd like to tackle this from the FreeRADIUS side rather than by reconfiguring
> rpm because I can think of other reasons why some idio^H^H^H^H well-meaning
> admin might stick a test file in there without realizing that it causes
> problems. Switching to a site-specif
So my server admins did what they're supposed to do and ran "yum update" on
everything last weekend. The updates included a refresh of the "freeradius2"
packages that took FR from 2.1.7 to 2.1.12.
That's all fine and dandy, except that what rpm does when it has config files
that are part of a
6 matches
Mail list logo
