Re: gigawords how to?

2008-05-27 Thread Oguzhan Kayhan
Opps..Sorry I just missed to type a "," after outputoctets line. Problem solved. > Hello, i tried to add gigawords for freeradius 2.0 > And added the gigawords lines as i seen on web and final version was like > this.. > > accounting_update_query = "UPDATE ${acct_table1} \ > SET FramedI

Re: Gigawords

2007-09-14 Thread Guilherme Franco
Hi Mr. DeKok, Ok, I've just asked it because of: http://wiki.freeradius.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_do_Acct-Input-Octets_and_Acct-Output-Octets_wrap_at_4_GB.3F (which says that it should work in older versions) Also, the rlm_sql_log module version is the same in 1.1.7 as in 1.1.4 (v 1.3.2.2 2005/12/12)

Re: Gigawords

2007-09-14 Thread Guilherme Franco
Hello Mr. Mayers, I don't think so cause I've copied the very same sintax that can be found in oraclesql.conf of FR 1.1.7. Thank you. Guilherme Franco On 9/14/07, Phil Mayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 00:05 -0300, Guilherme Franco wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm using r

Re: Gigawords

2007-09-14 Thread Alan DeKok
Guilherme Franco wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using rlm_sql_log in freeradius 1.1.4. > > In order to correctly work with acct-input/ output gigawords, Upgrade to 1.1.7. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Gigawords

2007-09-14 Thread Phil Mayers
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 00:05 -0300, Guilherme Franco wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using rlm_sql_log in freeradius 1.1.4. > > In order to correctly work with acct-input/ output gigawords, I've > replaced '%{Acct-Input-Octets}' with '%{%{Acct-Input-Gigawords}:-0}' > << 32 | '%{%{Acct-Input-Octets}:-0}'

Re: Gigawords

2004-04-06 Thread Alexander M. Pravking
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 04:31:30PM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote: > Steve Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The dictionaries don't concern me, what I need to do is log them. > > Unless I'm blind, there is no support for Accounting for them in SQL > > schema: > >So add them, and supply a patch to t

Re: Gigawords

2004-04-06 Thread Alan DeKok
Steve Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The dictionaries don't concern me, what I need to do is log them. > Unless I'm blind, there is no support for Accounting for them in SQL > schema: So add them, and supply a patch to the schema & queries. That's why they're in configuration files: so you c

Re: Gigawords

2004-04-06 Thread Steve Cole
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 15:07, Alan DeKok wrote: > Steve Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My problem is that Freeradius - even the CVS version - still seems to > > have no support for the RADIUS extensions for large data transfers > > (Acct-Input-Gigawords, Acct-Output-Gigawords). > > Huh? >

Re: Gigawords

2004-04-06 Thread Alan DeKok
Steve Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My problem is that Freeradius - even the CVS version - still seems to have no > support for the RADIUS extensions for large data transfers > (Acct-Input-Gigawords, Acct-Output-Gigawords). Huh? [EMAIL PROTECTED] radiusd]$ grep -i giga share/dictionary