Re: Realm attribute population

2013-07-25 Thread Phil Mayers
On 25/07/13 10:43, stefan.pae...@diamond.ac.uk wrote: Alan, https://confluence.terena.org/display/H2eduroam/freeradius-sp implies that after v2.1.9, "%{Realm}" would contain "DEFAULT", not whatever the realm extracted from User-Name was, when used in logging... Hence my question. Of course, i

RE: Realm attribute population

2013-07-25 Thread stefan.paetow
Stefan > -Original Message- > From: freeradius-users- > bounces+stefan.paetow=diamond.ac...@lists.freeradius.org > [mailto:freeradius-users- > bounces+stefan.paetow=diamond.ac...@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of > Alan DeKok > Sent: 25 July 2013 01:47 > To: FreeRadius u

Re: Realm attribute population

2013-07-24 Thread Alan DeKok
stefan.pae...@diamond.ac.uk wrote: > After FreeRADIUS 2.10, we had to replace the DEFAULT {} stanza with the below > in proxy.conf to ensure that the Realm attribute was correctly populated: Huh? That's wrong. The DEFAULT realm works just fine. And it's not "DEFAULT {}". See raddb/proxy.c

Realm attribute population

2013-07-24 Thread stefan.paetow
Hi, After FreeRADIUS 2.10, we had to replace the DEFAULT {} stanza with the below in proxy.conf to ensure that the Realm attribute was correctly populated: realm "~.+$" { authhost = "host to deal with other realms" : : } Is that still necessary for FR 3.0? I'm just updat