Re: SIGHUP working?

inverse wrote: > talking again about it.. > as you already know, my problem is CRL reloading. > Is it too bad if I modify the rlm_eap_tls code to reload the CRL/CA > cert when needed? (i.e. when there's an EAP TLS auth going on)? > I'm willing to give it at least a try with ver 1.1.6 which I'm cur

Re: SIGHUP working?

On 7/6/07, Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roy Walker wrote: > I've spent a fair amount of time looking into proper HUP handling. It > turns out *no one* does it well. Almost all daemons simply restart. > > Alan DeKok. talking again about it.. as you already know, my problem is CRL r

Re: SIGHUP working?

Roy Walker wrote: > Is SIGHUP working in CVS? You can HUP the server, but there's no guarantee it will continue to work afterwards. 1.x is the same. Realistically, you can't HUP apache, either. It looks like you can, but behind the scenes it essentially re-starts from scr

SIGHUP working?

Is SIGHUP working in CVS? - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html