Hi,
one of the main issues is using a distro version of the code.
what they do to the files provided in the TARBALL is up to them.
i would advise doing something like
locate scripts | grep -i radius
...they might have been dumped into somewhere like /usr/share/doc/radiusd
or somesuch.
you can
hi,
Charles, this is an unpaid community support list. you are coming
across as a very angry person with no regard that the people
on this list arent paid to give you informaation which is probably
essential for you to actually do your work, get paid etc.
if you'd actually like any help/advice
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
one of the main issues is using a distro version of the code.
(nod) Once John mentioned a folder I just didn't have, the light came on
(so to speak) :)
...they might have been dumped into somewhere like /usr/share/doc/radiusd
or
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Charles, this is an unpaid community support list. you are coming
across as a very angry person with no regard that the people
on this list arent paid to give you informaation which is probably
essential for you to actually do your work, get
On 15/6/09 16:37, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
one of the main issues is using a distro version of the code.
(nod) Once John mentioned a folder I just didn't have, the light came on
(so to speak) :)
...they might have been dumped into
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
See the thing is a lot of the documentation pitfalls aren't there in 2.*, a
lot of the inconsistencys aren't there in 2.*. I know, because I regularly
play the dumb user and pester Alan about niggly bits of syntax and
documentation.
I try to be
Enough already :-) Take it off list please.
--
John Dennis jden...@redhat.com
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
hi,
H. My first gut reaction is that I don't know enough, but before
I dismiss this idea, I have to ask what you have in mind.
I think the initial idea would be to document what/how you've used
exec module to define an attribute - rlm_exec is quite bare on the wiki ;-)
alan
-
List
Charles Gregory wrote:
No, I'm offended that you can say things like you have NO IDEA when
clearly anyone who read my first post would know what I was asking.
Yes, but you were given 5-6 options for solving the problem. Instead,
you did something that was not documented as working, and which
Charles Gregory wrote:
Five or six huh? Quote them. Paraphrase them. And don't just lamely say
check the archives because I did that when I double-checked that you
'had no idea'. I've been up and down this thread a few times now. And
there is NO posting with clear code like the one I posted in
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Alan DeKok wrote:
Charles Gregory wrote:
Five or six huh? Quote them.
1) Read my messages.
That's rich coming from you.
The text you *deleted* pointed you to documentation for the
users file, and the SQL module.
Speaking of 'not reading' didn't you catch my
Charles Gregory wrote:
Well, keeping in mind that this is now a philosphical discussion...
And it's mostly wasted. The time spent arguing over the documentation
would have been better spent installing 2.x, which has much better
documentation.
Notice the complete lack of instruction as to
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Ivan Kalik wrote:
Nothing to give. You already have it in scripts/exec-program-wait.
I do not have a directory named 'scripts'. And the only reference to
'exec-program-wait' is in the comments of 'experimental.conf' as something
that a 'perl' rlm can 'replace'. I'm
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Alan DeKok wrote:
No... I had NO IDEA what you were trying to do.
I had gotten the impression that you don't read posts thoroughly,
and this only reinforces that perception. My very first post said:
I've been cruising the archives and pages and don't quite see
what
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Ivan Kalik wrote:
. I'm really thinking that CentOS screwed up some documentation
Could be. They might have packaged server core without examples. ..
If you want you can download and unpack your version tarball from the
freeradius site
Just because I am
Charles Gregory wrote:
It clearly conveys my intention and my first attempt at code.
Yes... and it clearly conveys that you hadn't read the documentation
that came with the version you had.
So with (dwindling) respect, if you can't get the IDEA from that
then you really are a serious waste
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Alan DeKok wrote:
and yet you're frustrated that I'm explaining the *reasons* behind my
opinions.
No, I'm offended that you can say things like you have NO IDEA when
clearly anyone who read my first post would know what I was asking.
It's one step short of outright
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Ivan Kalik wrote:
Work what out?
Finally got my 1.x Session-Time script working (as an exec module). The
really strange thing is that it is working *exactly* as I first thought
I should be doing it!!! (see below) I can only guess that somewhere along
the way I had a
Charles Gregory wrote:
I did try to follow the oft-quoted (almost shoved down my throat)
example, right from the comments within the config file
postauth {
Session-Timeout := `%{exec:/usr/local/etc/timecalc %{User-Name}}`
}
No... that won't work. The examples given to you weren't
Well, keeping in mind that this is now a philosphical discussion...
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Alan DeKok wrote:
Charles Gregory wrote:
I did try to follow the oft-quoted (almost shoved down my throat)
example, right from the comments within the config file
postauth {
Session-Timeout :=
Well, firstly, no one *gave* me 'examples',
Nothing to give. You already have it in scripts/exec-program-wait. It's
included in the distribution. Should be in same place in your version too.
they said just to look in my
radiusd.conf, and secondly, yes, it's exactly 'like that':
#
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Ivan Kalik wrote:
Nothing to give. You already have it in scripts/exec-program-wait.
I do not have a directory named 'scripts'. And the only reference to
'exec-program-wait' is in the comments of 'experimental.conf' as something
that a 'perl' rlm can 'replace'. I'm really
22 matches
Mail list logo
