in sql.conf untouched. In my setup, I did not
have that luxury, thus the override of attribute name to a hard-wired
"RESTENA-SSHA1-Password".
> [pap] login attempt with password "senhasecreta"
> [pap] Using SSHA encryption.
> [pap] User authenticated successfully
>
unlang and xlat?
Without these extra configuration, the messages from authorization are now:
[pap] login attempt with password "senhasecreta"
[pap] Using SSHA encryption.
[pap] User authenticated successfully
++[pap] = ok
So the "Normalizing error" and segmentation fault isn't happening anymore.
Thanks!
[]'s
Hugo
www.devin.com.br
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi,
> http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-devel/2013-May/008046.html
> http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2013-May/066440.html
>
> I also did everything that Stefan Winter did - gdb live server,
> valgrind, look at the source, compare with 3.0 - and got the same
>
Hi,
I'm getting the same errors as these messages:
http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-devel/2013-May/008046.html
http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2013-May/066440.html
I also did everything that Stefan Winter did - gdb live server,
valgrind, look at the source,
>
>
> it looks like a bug in src/modules/rlm_preprocess/rlm_preprocess.c but we're
> not so sure about the resolution; has anyone encountered/solved the same
> issue?
This should be on devel, but nevermind.
Should be fixed, can you check?
-Arran
Arran Cudbard-Bell
FreeRADIUS Development Te
gt;name, name) == 0)) &&
(gdb) n
411 (paircompare(request, request_pairs,
i->check, NULL) == 0)) {
(gdb) n
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x775d4a56 in paircompare (request=0xaf9870, req_list=0xaf9ce0,
check=0x9f8fe0, rep_list=0
Thank you Alan,
I thought I had removed the old version already, but turns out it was actually still there lingering in the background.
Once I got that figured out the FR server will start and take packets without seg faults.
Much appreaciated for the quick response.
Regards,
Mitch
<>
hi,
my initial feeling/thoughts is that you have libraries from another version of
FR on your system. use 'locate' and 'find' tool to check locations of rlm_*
files.
I'd remove them all and reinstall from sourceand check that dynamic
libraries
are all properly linked - 'ldconfig -v'
alan
-
nticate the user.
Using Post-Auth-Type Reject
+- entering group REJECT {...}
[attr_filter.access_reject] expand: %{User-Name} -> host/RCDSB-Class Client
attr_filter: Matched entry DEFAULT at line 11
Segmentation fault
The other curiousity that I see here is that the server does not appear to re
On 27.02.2013 02:59, Jennifer Mehl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just updated to Debian wheezy 7.0, kernel 3.2.0-4-amd64, and the
> accompanying freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2. (Previously using Debian squeeze
> 6.0 and freeradius 2.1.10+dfsg-2+squeeze1.)
There's a know bug in 2.1.*. You should really upg
Hi Manuel,
Please read through the wiki page on bug reports:
http://wiki.freeradius.org/project/bug-reports
-Arran
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hello
I'm quite new to freeradius and I experienced my first issue right away
after trying the first attempt.
If I run a quick test on localhost I get a segmentation fault
Tue Dec 4 10:17:11 2012 : Debug: Listening on authentication address *
port 1812
Tue Dec 4 10:17:11 2012 :
Bryan Dobson wrote:
> Thank you for the reply, I thought this as well, but, checking the
> system all I only see a single set of client libraries installed:
It's not a FreeRADIUS problem. Something, somewhere, is
using the wrong library. Use "ldd" to figure out which are being used.
Alan
Hello Bryan,
> [root@radiusdev ~]# rpm -qa | grep mysql
> mysql-5.1.61-4.el6.x86_64
> mysql-devel-5.1.61-4.el6.x86_64
> mysql-libs-5.1.61-4.el6.x86_64
> mysql-server-5.1.61-4.el6.x86_64
they all belong to same release.
> Do I need all of those or is one causing me the issue still with the
> faul
ting authentication, which goes to a remote MySQL database which
>> was pre-existing with all user data. It executes the query and then
>> immediately gives me a segmentation fault. Of note I have also
>> compiled version 2.2 from source and receive the exact same error. I
>>
ser data. It executes the query and then
> immediately gives me a segmentation fault. Of note I have also
> compiled version 2.2 from source and receive the exact same error. I
> would prefer, if a tall possible to stick to using the RPM's from the
> distribution.
You have two vers
On 25/09/12 23:04, arnauld ndefo wrote:
Hi,
I tried to recompile freeradius raising option O2 in CFLAGS. I followed
This is getting to be a really frequent request.
It's an experimental module; it's not supported, you need to figure this
out yourself.
Why do you need to use rlm_eap2? Spe
arnauld ndefo wrote:
> When my openpana client sent an authenticator mesage ,I had a
> segmentation fault, and I always value optimized out in the gdb trace
> (gdb-radiuslog1).
Debugging these kind of issues requires experience and training. The
"value optimized out" messa
)
When my openpana client sent an authenticator mesage ,I had a segmentation
fault, and I always value optimized out in the gdb trace (gdb-radiuslog1).
I don't understand why the different librairies related to the rlm_eap2 module
in /usr/local/lib are not up to date when i rebuild the servers.
On 17 Sep 2012, at 10:34, Stefan Winter wrote:
> Hi,
>
--with-openssl-includes=/usr/local/freeradius/openssl-1.0.1c/include/openssl
>
>>> Are you sure? The "openssl SEGV" problem is almost always because you
>>> have two versions of OpenSSL installed.
>>>
>>> What is likely happening
Hi,
>>> --with-openssl-includes=/usr/local/freeradius/openssl-1.0.1c/include/openssl
>> Are you sure? The "openssl SEGV" problem is almost always because you
>> have two versions of OpenSSL installed.
>>
>> What is likely happening is that the compile stage is picking up the
>> system-suppli
Hi,
>> Today, I compiled with
>>
>> --with-openssl
>> --with-openssl-includes=/usr/local/freeradius/openssl-1.0.1c/include/openssl
>>
>> --with-openssl-libraries=/usr/local/freeradius/openssl-1.0.1c/lib
>>
>> the path is in ld.so.conf, and ldd shows that linking against this new
>> version works.
Stefan Winter wrote:
> until today, I have been running FreeRADIUS 2.2.0 successfully with a
> system-supplied openSSL.
>
> Today, I compiled with
>
> --with-openssl
> --with-openssl-includes=/usr/local/freeradius/openssl-1.0.1c/include/openssl
>
> --with-openssl-libraries=/usr/local/freeradius/
in ld.so.conf, and ldd shows that linking against this new
version works.
However, when running PEAP on this version, I get a segmentation fault now:
[eap] Request found, released from the list
[eap] EAP/peap
[eap] processing type peap
[peap] processing EAP-TLS
[peap] eaptls_verify returned 7
[peap
David Aldwinckle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On my dev server I have 2.2 and on my prod server I have 2.1.12. The
> behaviour is the same on both.
Any feedback on this?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Thanks Phil, I will provide the gdb logs as soon as I can.
Dave
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 15/08/12 14:34, David Aldwinckle wrote:
Hi,
On my dev server I have 2.2 and on my prod server I have 2.1.12. The behaviour
is the same on both.
Ok. You'll still need to obtain a traceback, as per the instructions in
"doc/bugs". It shouldn't take long.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? S
Hi,
On my dev server I have 2.2 and on my prod server I have 2.1.12. The behaviour
is the same on both.
Dave
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 15/08/12 14:17, David Aldwinckle wrote:
Hello,
This morning I was attempting to move dialup (PPP) authentication to
FreeRadius, and was met with a segmentation fault. I am using version
2.2
Do you really mean 2.2?
Anyway see "docs/bugs" for details of how to debug this.
-
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:17 PM, David Aldwinckle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This morning I was attempting to move dialup (PPP) authentication to
> FreeRadius, and was met with a segmentation fault. I am using version 2.2
2.2 has not been released yet. Do you mean 2.1.12? Or did you build
l
Hello,
This morning I was attempting to move dialup (PPP) authentication to
FreeRadius, and was met with a segmentation fault. I am using version 2.2 on
RHEL. Below are details of my configuration. Users are using MSCHAPv2.
/etc/raddb/users
DEFAULT Framed-Protocol == PPP, Proxy-To-Realm
John Dennis wrote:
> FWIW, we've gotten a couple of bug reports of segfaults using EAP, they
> are described in this bugzilla (which includes a stacktrace and debug
> output).
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827858
This is typically caused by having discordant versions of OpenSS
On 08/09/2012 09:34 AM, Urban Loesch wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to the list. I'm currently migrating from "Radiator" to
Freeradius with MySQL Database Backend for Authentication and
Accounting. User-passwords are stored in mysql db with SMD5.
FWIW, we've gotten a couple of bug reports of segfaults us
Hi Alan,
thanks for your fast reply.
If you need any further info please let me know.
A copy of the SMD5 password.
This is the whole raw data from db:
id usernameattribute op value
4105urban@1 SMD5-Password :=
kB49X7B1aX5kzg6+OD6L12ZxRGRmcUM
Urban Loesch wrote:
> [pap] login attempt with password "232nr4Cs"
> [pap] Using SMD5 encryption.
> [pap] Normalizing SMD5-Password from base64 encoding
> Segmentation fault
Oops. My guess is that the SMD5 password isn't correctly formed.
Can you share it?
>
eeradius/sites-enabled/default
+- entering group PAP {...}
[pap] login attempt with password "232nr4Cs"
[pap] Using SMD5 encryption.
[pap] Normalizing SMD5-Password from base64 encoding
Segmentation fault
The Kernel logs the message:
kernel: [10466122.427567] freeradius[20622]: segfaul
...and what information are you providing? I see nothing with this report
(ps if this is with an version, then the first thing you do is try the latest
release as it may have already been fixed)
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi I am just reporting a segfault.
Regards,
Prateek
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 20/07/12 14:16, Prateek Kumar wrote:
Hi,
Can reproduce in 2.1.10 also. Currently can not upgrade. So will
try in some other system.
Do you actually want/think you need a duplicate client and if so, why?
Or are you just reporting the segfault?
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See ht
Hi,
Can reproduce in 2.1.10 also. Currently can not upgrade. So will try
in some other system.
Regards,
Prateek
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Prateek Kumar wrote:
> I have 2 ldap modules which are selected by unlang logic and I
> have configured my certificates as default. Now when I put a dupticate
> client entry in clients.conf file & then kill the radius server I got a
> error like *** glibc detected *** radiusd: free(): inva
Hi
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:09:51PM +0530, Prateek Kumar wrote:
> error like *** glibc detected *** radiusd: free(): invalid pointer:
> 0xb778e994. Also some time I get the error like munmap_chunk(): invalid
> pointer. If I remove the duplicate client entry then I don't see the error.
So remove
Hi,
I have 2 ldap modules which are selected by unlang logic and I
have configured my certificates as default. Now when I put a dupticate
client entry in clients.conf file & then kill the radius server I got a
error like *** glibc detected *** radiusd: free(): invalid pointer:
0xb778e994.
DaveA wrote:
> FreeRadius has been stable for about a month, up until yesterday, and I have
> not changed the configuration of the server. I began seeing segmentation
> faults as seen below:
See doc/bugs for how to help debug problems.
> I have not included my radiusd -X because it will need to
my fingers crossed that someone can help with only the
information I've provided.
Can anyone tell me how to prevent this, or if a fix is available?
Thank you,
Dave A.
--
View this message in context:
http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/Segmentation-Fault-in-2-1-12-rlm-eap-2-1-
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Ski Mountain
wrote:
> It was simply installed from the ubuntu repository with aptitiude.
>
> Does this mean that I should just try compiling a new version of freeradius
> from source,
Yes, if you know how to build from source.
Or take a look at https://launchpa
: Ski Mountain ; FreeRadius users mailing list
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: freradius Segmentation fault
Ski Mountain wrote:
> I am testing out authentication with radtest. If I send the wrong group
> password I get "invalid Message-Authenticator"
Ski Mountain wrote:
> I am testing out authentication with radtest. If I send the wrong group
> password I get "invalid Message-Authenticator" which is what I expect, the
> second I put in the correct password I get the "Segmentation fault"
>
> Is t
I am testing out authentication with radtest. If I send the wrong group
password I get "invalid Message-Authenticator" which is what I expect, the
second I put in the correct password I get the "Segmentation fault"
This is on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS.
Is this a knows iss
Rajkumar balaji wrote:
> When I try to start radius using ./radiusd -X the following error I am
> getting Please help me to resolve this
>
> The machine is Sun solaris 10 Sparc
> FreeRadius verion 1.1.7 is the latest from sunfreeware site
Ask the sunfreeware people why they broke FreeRADIUS.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Rajkumar balaji
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> When I try to start radius using ./radiusd -X the following error I am
> getting Please help me to resolve this
>
> The machine is Sun solaris 10 Sparc
> FreeRadius verion 1.1.7 is the latest from sunfreeware site
Sorry, can't h
orize = no
proxy: wake_all_if_all_dead = no
security: max_attributes = 200
security: reject_delay = 1
security: status_server = no
main: debug_level = 0
read_config_files: reading dictionary
read_config_files: reading naslist
Using deprecated naslist file. Support for this will go away s
John Dennis writes:
> * FreeRADIUS has way too much churn for a critical system
> service. Think about other system services, how often do you see
> kerberos, bind, iptables, pam, MySQL, etc. going through significant
> revisions? Are the administrators of those services constantly being
> told t
Hi,
> This is a production server,
> What is the latest stable version to use?
'stable' is all in the mind ;-)
we run the latest 2.1.11 from GIT on our production servers (nee 2.1.12)
and a 3.x release on a couple of test servers to test/see the new functions.
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscr
Hi,
> > * FreeRADIUS has no notion of a "stable release". Many projects maintain
'stable' or 'stale'
if you go for the 'stable' release of most daemons you will not
have the ability to do certain things, the latest version will have those
abilities.
in the FR case, the most 'tested' version i
John Dennis wrote:
> FreeRADIUS has some problems which other projects have avoided.
Sure. The reasons are pretty straightforward. The contribution from
the community is small. The people who contribute get few rewards, and
lots of arrows. The people who complain don't contribute.
It's re
Upgraded freeradius to 2.1.11 (built from source)
Don't use 2.1.11 it segfaults, checkout the head of the 2.1.X branch in git
Notice how I DIDN'T suggest upgrading to 2.1.11, but to v2.1.x of git
branch? There's a reason for that, and you just found out the hard
way.
"Houston, we have a p
>
> -Original Message-
> From: freeradius-users-bounces+amir=ccc.co...@lists.freeradius.org
> [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+amir=ccc.co...@lists.freeradius.org] On
> Behalf Of Fajar A. Nugraha
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:02 AM
> To: FreeRadius users maili
02, 2011 11:02 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: segmentation fault freeradius 2.1.7 using rlm_sql
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Amir Tal wrote:
> Upgraded freeradius to 2.1.11 (built from source)
>
> This time it brought the whole machine down:
Notice how I DIDN&
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Amir Tal wrote:
> Upgraded freeradius to 2.1.11 (built from source)
>
> This time it brought the whole machine down:
Notice how I DIDN'T suggest upgrading to 2.1.11, but to v2.1.x of git
branch? There's a reason for that, and you just found out the hard
way.
--
F
On 2 Aug 2011, at 09:27, Amir Tal wrote:
> Upgraded freeradius to 2.1.11 (built from source)
Don't use 2.1.11 it segfaults, checkout the head of the 2.1.X branch in git
-Arran
Arran Cudbard-Bell
a.cudba...@freeradius.org
RADIUS - Half the complexity of Diameter
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscr
-bounces+amir=ccc.co...@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf
Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:33 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: segmentation fault freeradius 2.1.7 using rlm_sql
Amir Tal wrote:
> For some unknown reason radiusd keeps getting segmentation faults, ev
age-
> From: freeradius-users-bounces+amir=ccc.co...@lists.freeradius.org
> [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+amir=ccc.co...@lists.freeradius.org] On
> Behalf Of Alan DeKok
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:33 PM
> To: FreeRadius users mailing list
> Subject: Re: segmentation fau
, 2011 4:33 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: segmentation fault freeradius 2.1.7 using rlm_sql
Amir Tal wrote:
> For some unknown reason radiusd keeps getting segmentation faults, every few
> days and even after several hours of work.
Upgrade.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/sub
Amir Tal wrote:
> For some unknown reason radiusd keeps getting segmentation faults, every few
> days and even after several hours of work.
Upgrade.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi all,
freeRADIUS version 2.1.7
(package freeradius2 on centos 5.6)
Radius is configured to store user info (auth) in ldap - running on same
machine as freeradius,
and use rlm_sql for accounting info (and simultaneous use checks) - running on
remote machine.
For some unknown reason radiusd ke
Juan Pablo L. wrote:
> Hi, i m writing a module2 for freeradius 2.1.10 on linux 2.6.18-194.el5PAE.
> this is the code:
...
> I have no idea what the problem is.
See doc/bugs
This list isn't the place to discuss debugging code you write.
> What is the different between pairmake and radius_pai
"Cleartext-password","smart",T_OP_SET);
pairadd(&request->config_items, vp_clear_password);
// create and add the callback-id
vp = pairmake("callback-id","0702005010701059",T_OP_SET);
pairadd(&request->reply->vps,vp);
but the pairfind is
Thomas Fagart wrote:
> Hum I don't get it I've got this bug in 2.1.10.
Yes, I know. I've been reading your messages.
> This means I should get the latest git ?
Yes, that's what I ws trying to say.
If was fixed in an official release, I would have said that. Instead,
I pointed you to the
Hum I don't get it I've got this bug in 2.1.10. This means I should get
the latest git ?
Thomas
Le 19/11/2010 07:43, Alan DeKok a écrit :
Thomas Fagart wrote:
I've enable develloper mode, now I've got the following output :
...
ASSERT FAILED event.c[1181]: "We do not have threads, but the r
David Seira wrote:
> I'm trying radmin with freeradius 2.1.10, in debian distro with
> 2.6.26-2-686 kernel. When I put the "show module config sql" I receive a
> segmentation fault un radiusd.
>
> Has anybody have the same bug?
Nope. See doc/bugs for he
Hi list,
I'm trying radmin with freeradius 2.1.10, in debian distro with 2.6.26-2-686
kernel. When I put the "show module config sql" I receive a segmentation
fault un radiusd.
Has anybody have the same bug?
Regards,
David
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.free
Thomas Fagart wrote:
> I've enable develloper mode, now I've got the following output :
...
> ASSERT FAILED event.c[1181]: "We do not have threads, but the request is
> marked as queued or running in a child thread" == NULL
Ah, that's easy. It's fixed in git commit 5849d7aa69. See the v2.1.x
b
uest 6:
Discarding the request!
Segmentation fault
And then the proxy radius dies.
That's not good.
This happens each time at the fifth try while trying to send the request
to a dead home server.
I haven't been able to reproduce it, so it's difficult to track down
I know
Hello Thomas.
I have the same problem
After installing 2.1.6 version everything worked well .
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Thomas Fagart wrote:
...
> WARNING: Internal sanity check failed in event handler for request 6:
> Discarding the request!
> Segmentation fault
>
> And then the proxy radius dies.
That's not good.
> This happens each time at the fifth try while trying to send the r
3
Service-Type = Framed-User
Message-Authenticator := 0x
Proxy-State = 0x313137
Waking up in 21.0 seconds.
WARNING: Internal sanity check failed in event handler for request 6:
Discarding the request!
Segmentation fault
And then the proxy radius dies.
This happe
Michel Musslin wrote:
> I actually try to cross compile freeradius 2.0.9 for powerpc. Everything
> looks good during compilation, but we get "Segmentation Fault" on our
> host when executing "radiusd -X".
>
> Our setup is :
> - EGLIBC 2.9
> - GCC 4.3.
Hello,
I actually try to cross compile freeradius 2.0.9 for powerpc. Everything
looks good during compilation, but we get "Segmentation Fault" on our
host when executing "radiusd -X".
Our setup is :
- EGLIBC 2.9
- GCC 4.3.2
- Linux 2.6.31
Could you please help me to
es a request
> (radtest testing password 127.0.0.1 0 testing123) I get following crash
> (sorry for the long log).
>
> Any ideas how to fix it or where the problem is?
See doc/bugs
> /etc/freeradius/sites-enabled/default
> +- entering group authorize {...}
> Segmentation fault
r = *
port = 0
}
listen {
type = "acct"
ipaddr = *
port = 0
}
listen {
type = "auth"
ipaddr = 127.0.0.1
port = 18120
}
Listening on authentication address * port 1812
Listening on accounting address * port 1813
Listening on authentication address 127.0.0.1 port 18120 as server
inner-tunnel
Listening on proxy address * port 1814
Ready to process requests.
rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 127.0.0.1 port 53199, id=58,
length=59
User-Name = "testing"
User-Password = "password"
NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.1.1
NAS-Port = 0
# Executing section authorize from file
/etc/freeradius/sites-enabled/default
+- entering group authorize {...}
Segmentation fault
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
t problem. I've just written $INCLUDE ./users.other and the
problem gone.
I can't use databases, because it's so complicated to replicate databases
between offices. I store accounting of different brench offices in 5
databases.
Ok i will try to find a way how to replicate only the pin
coja wrote:
> Could you please tell me how i can include my pins file to users file.
> When i write line like $INCLUDE pins in the beginning of the users file, i
> can see how that line will disapear after reload or restart.
Huh? The "users" file is reloaded, along with all $INCLUDE files.
M
as special rights for apache.
Are there exist ways to do it somehow or i shoul work with users file
through interface?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Segmentation-fault-on-2.1.7-during-HUP-tp28590790p28614839.html
Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
coja wrote:
> Hello all!
> We use 2.1.7 version of freeradius+mysql 5 running on RHEL4u8.
> We tried to apply PIN authentication based on file users which located in
> /etc/raddb.
> I inserted to crontab reload (HUP) command which runs every 30 minutes.
In 2.1.8 you can use "radmin" to reload *
Segmentation
fault error in sql_log module.
I turned off this module, but it didn't help us. Now it's happening with
voip-postpaid module which was adapted to mysql.
I read docs/bugs and tried to trace the bug, but in gdb radius was working 3
days without any crash.
All that I have my configs
Nothing I can help.
Maybe you can check the dynamic shared library,they may conflict with
radiusd,
2010/5/7
> Здравствуйте, Коньков.
>
> Вы писали 6 мая 2010 г., 23:58:44:
>
>
> КЕ> Help pls to resolve problem why radiusd segfault
> КЕ> or give clue
>
> КЕ> kes# radiusd -v
> КЕ> radiusd: FreeRAD
Здравствуйте, Коньков.
Вы писали 6 мая 2010 г., 23:58:44:
КЕ> Help pls to resolve problem why radiusd segfault
КЕ> or give clue
КЕ> kes# radiusd -v
КЕ> radiusd: FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.3, for host
КЕ> i386-portbld-freebsd7.1, built on Jan 6 2009 at 10:52:08
КЕ> Copyright (C) 1999-2008 The FreeR
Help pls to resolve problem why radiusd segfault
or give clue
kes# radiusd -v
radiusd: FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.3, for host i386-portbld-freebsd7.1, built on
Jan 6 2009 at 10:52:08
Copyright (C) 1999-2008 The FreeRADIUS server project and contributors.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTA
04:01 2010 : Info: (7) [ttls] eaptls_process returned 3
> Segmentation fault
>
>
> Any ideas why radiusd is segfaulting?
It works for me. I suggest:
$ make distclean
$ ./configure
$ make
again. The internal code has changed quite a bit. Maybe you're
running into a si
o: (7) [ttls] eaptls_verify returned 3
Wed Apr 28 09:04:01 2010 : Info: (7) [ttls] eaptls_process returned 3
Segmentation fault
Any ideas why radiusd is segfaulting?
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
matthew.strin...@bt.com wrote:
> Hi all, I am a bit of a FreeRadius newbie and am having some issues with the
> accounting, getting segmentation fault reported back.
>
> I have FreeRadius 2.1.8 running on CentOS 5.4, set up in a pretty basic
> configuration. It is authentica
Hi all, I am a bit of a FreeRadius newbie and am having some issues with the
accounting, getting segmentation fault reported back.
I have FreeRadius 2.1.8 running on CentOS 5.4, set up in a pretty basic
configuration. It is authenticating to a MySQL database that contains records
for 300,000
Harshil Anil Kumar Shah wrote:
> I have not modified the code.
> and I checked the swap area, is 2 GB.
> What can be the problem?
You need to read the messages on this list.
You need to read the documentation we tell you to read.
You need to follow the instructions in the documentation.
@lists.freeradius.org] On
Behalf Of Alan Buxey [a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 2:54 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault
Hi,
> There is nothing in the bugs file
doc/bugs is a document that explains what to do if come across an
issue -
Hi,
> There is nothing in the bugs file
doc/bugs is a document that explains what to do if come across an
issue - eg segmentation fault. read that document, follow the instructions
and, if something is wrong with the code rather than your OS, the
server code can be fixed (which, I guess, is &
] On
Behalf Of Alan DeKok [al...@deployingradius.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 2:37 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault
Harshil Anil Kumar Shah wrote:
> Getting the Segmentation fault when doing radiusd -X
Read doc/bugs
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscr
Harshil Anil Kumar Shah wrote:
> Getting the Segmentation fault when doing radiusd -X
Read doc/bugs
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Getting the Segmentation fault when doing radiusd -X
home_server_pool my_auth_failover {
type = fail-over
home_server = localhost
}
realm example.com {
auth_pool = my_auth_failover
}
realm LOCAL {
}
radiusd: Loading Clients
client localhost
J Brandon Polley wrote:
> I'm running FreeRadius Version: 2.1.8
> 1. SUSE Linux
>
> My problem is that when I turn on a setting in FreeRadius it crashes and
> gives me "Segmentation Fault" when someone tries to login.
> Here is the file im editing: raddb/sites-av
1 - 100 of 511 matches
Mail list logo
