On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, t...@kalik.net wrote:
I used wireshark to capture the working and non-working PPTP
authentication. There is a difference, but I don't know how to interpret
what's missing on the failed reply. Anyone want to have a look? Files are
attached (I hope).
That's the conversatio
>>> I used wireshark to capture the working and non-working PPTP
>>> authentication. There is a difference, but I don't know how to interpret
>>> what's missing on the failed reply. Anyone want to have a look? Files are
>>> attached (I hope).
>>>
>>
>> That's the conversation between NAS and the cl
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, t...@kalik.net wrote:
I used wireshark to capture the working and non-working PPTP
authentication. There is a difference, but I don't know how to interpret
what's missing on the failed reply. Anyone want to have a look? Files are
attached (I hope).
That's the conversatio
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, t...@kalik.net wrote:
I used wireshark to capture the working and non-working PPTP
authentication. There is a difference, but I don't know how to interpret
what's missing on the failed reply. Anyone want to have a look? Files are
attached (I hope).
That's the conversatio
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, t...@kalik.net wrote:
I used wireshark to capture the working and non-working PPTP
authentication. There is a difference, but I don't know how to interpret
what's missing on the failed reply. Anyone want to have a look? Files are
attached (I hope).
That's the conversatio
>I used wireshark to capture the working and non-working PPTP
>authentication. There is a difference, but I don't know how to interpret
>what's missing on the failed reply. Anyone want to have a look? Files are
>attached (I hope).
>
That's the conversation between NAS and the client, not NAS and r
Mike Diggins wrote:
> I used wireshark to capture the working and non-working PPTP
> authentication. There is a difference, but I don't know how to interpret
> what's missing on the failed reply. Anyone want to have a look? Files
> are attached (I hope).
Wireshark will show you the contents as R
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Alan DeKok wrote:
Mike Diggins wrote:
I have a cisco vpn3030 concentrator with both IPSec and PPTP clients.
IPSec clients can successfully connect using my FreeRadius 2.1.3 server.
They use PAP, I believe. My PPTP clients are failing to connect. Every
indication on the Rad
Mike Diggins wrote:
> I have a cisco vpn3030 concentrator with both IPSec and PPTP clients.
> IPSec clients can successfully connect using my FreeRadius 2.1.3 server.
> They use PAP, I believe. My PPTP clients are failing to connect. Every
> indication on the Radius server is they have authenticate
>I have a cisco vpn3030 concentrator with both IPSec and PPTP clients.
>IPSec clients can successfully connect using my FreeRadius 2.1.3 server.
>They use PAP, I believe. My PPTP clients are failing to connect. Every
>indication on the Radius server is they have authenticated successfully,
>althoug
> FreeRadius debug log of failed connection:
>
> Ready to process requests.
> rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 172.26.69.8 port 1479, id=77,
> length=146
>User-Name = "test26"
>NAS-Port = 8057
>Service-Type = Framed-User
>Framed-Protocol = PPP
>Tunne
I have a cisco vpn3030 concentrator with both IPSec and PPTP clients.
IPSec clients can successfully connect using my FreeRadius 2.1.3 server.
They use PAP, I believe. My PPTP clients are failing to connect. Every
indication on the Radius server is they have authenticated successfully,
althou
12 matches
Mail list logo
