Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR & CoovaChilli

2013-10-09 Thread Russell Mike
Thanks Alan D understood. I will use unlang in accounting. Thanks On Wednesday, October 9, 2013, Alan DeKok wrote: > Russell Mike wrote: > >> So if you want to do something when the users traffic is over the quota, > >> you have to do it in the accounting section. > > > > Could you please kindly

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR & CoovaChilli

2013-10-09 Thread Alan DeKok
Russell Mike wrote: >> So if you want to do something when the users traffic is over the quota, >> you have to do it in the accounting section. > > Could you please kindly indicate what should i do there ? i tried to > perform the check again when user is online by adding counter entry in > *ses

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR & CoovaChilli

2013-10-09 Thread Russell Mike
Thanks Alan. D So if you want to do something when the users traffic is over the quota, you have to do it in the accounting section. Could you please kindly indicate what should i do there ? i tried to perform the check again when user is online by adding counter entry in * session* section. but

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR & CoovaChilli

2013-10-09 Thread Alan DeKok
Russell Mike wrote: > All-In-MB counter works. Please note, when a user has downloaded his > quota, counter do not force log off . The counter modules DOES NOT DO THAT. To see why, ask yourself what does FreeRADIUS see when the user has downloaded his quota? The answer is "nothing". The u

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR & CoovaChilli

2013-10-09 Thread Russell Mike
Dear Aran C. Bell Thanks for everything, Here is update. 1.) All-In-MB counter works. Please note, when a user has downloaded his quota, counter do not force log off . Saying other way, if the user is online, he would remain online until he log off him self or stop browsing. But point to be note

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR & CoovaChilli

2013-10-08 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 8 Oct 2013, at 15:40, Russell Mike wrote: > Dear Arran C. Bell, > > Thank you very much, i am extremely grateful for your advise and guidelines > for troubleshoot also. i am currently experimenting a different > rlm_sqlcounter using CoovaChilli dictionary "All-In-MB". In result, i can > s

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR & CoovaChilli

2013-10-08 Thread Russell Mike
Dear Arran C. Bell, Thank you very much, i am extremely grateful for your advise and guidelines for troubleshoot also. i am currently experimenting a different rlm_sqlcounter using CoovaChilli dictionary "All-In-MB". In result, i can store short number in db. This counter would reset at 2TB with s

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR & CoovaChilli

2013-10-08 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
> > > It might actually be an idea to add those to the internal dictionary to make > it a bit easier. Just to clarify there are two reasons why your current config isn't working: 1. rlm_sql stores the value as a proper 64bit integer, not in the two 32bit chunks represented by Acct-Input-Gigawo

Re: Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR & CoovaChilli

2013-10-08 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 8 Oct 2013, at 10:10, Russell Mike wrote: > Hi List Members > > i have been reading archives and tying to understand for some days now, but > unsuccessful. i am currently working to extend data volume control up to > 10GB, which is requirement for the organization. Is

Managing Data Volume Control More Than 4GB FR & CoovaChilli

2013-10-08 Thread Russell Mike
Hi List Members i have been reading archives and tying to understand for some days now, but unsuccessful. i am currently working to extend data volume control up to 10GB, which is requirement for the organization. Is anyone able to manage more then 4GB using CoovaChilli & Freeradius? Since t

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-17 Thread Alan DeKok
Russell Mike wrote: > Thanks you very(32) much. Thats what i wanted to know if it is not FR > limitation. It is a limitation of the RADIUS protocol. Integers are 32-bits. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-17 Thread Russell Mike
Dear Arrran, Thanks you very(32) much. Thats what i wanted to know if it is not FR limitation. Regards / RM -- On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Arran Cudbard-Bell < a.cudba...@freeradius.org> wrote: > > On 17 Apr 2013, at 05:27, Russell Mike wrote: > > > Hi Aran, thanks for clarification thro

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-17 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 17 Apr 2013, at 05:27, Russell Mike wrote: > Hi Aran, thanks for clarification through your response > If I understand your answer is that you are saying is that currently as is > freeRadius is using 64bits data types in some areas and not in others, am I > Right?. Also is it possible to al

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-17 Thread Russell Mike
Hi Aran, thanks for clarification through your response If I understand your answer is that you are saying is that currently as is freeRadius is using 64bits data types in some areas and not in others, am I Right?. Also is it possible to allow free radius to validate traffic above 4GB? Thanks / R

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-16 Thread Alan DeKok
Russell Mike wrote: > Dear Alan D. I may create a new rule. People who address mail to me personally get unsubscribed. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Volume Control

2013-04-16 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
> What Freeraidus is using currently as to keep track. Is it 64bit or 32bit. FreeRADIUS makes liberal use of 64bit data types. -Arran Arran Cudbard-Bell FreeRADIUS Development Team - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Volume Control

2013-04-16 Thread Russell Mike
Dear Alan D. What Freeraidus is using currently as to keep track. Is it 64bit or 32bit. Thanks / Regards - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: RFC3576 & traffic volume control

2004-12-03 Thread Alan DeKok
"David Luyens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, then 2 questions: > - who can do this and is available? > - how much would that cost? http://www.freeradius.org/business/ Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

RE: RFC3576 & traffic volume control

2004-12-03 Thread David Luyens
lume control David Luyens wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any plans to support RFC3576, more particularly the disconnect > message? > > I would like to see it implemented for traffic volume control. > > Please don not tell me to write the code myself as I am not a programme

Re: RFC3576 & traffic volume control

2004-12-03 Thread Josh Howlett
David Luyens wrote: Hi, Are there any plans to support RFC3576, more particularly the disconnect message? I would like to see it implemented for traffic volume control. Please don not tell me to write the code myself as I am not a programmer The other alternative is to sponsor a FreeRADIUS

RFC3576 & traffic volume control

2004-12-02 Thread David Luyens
Hi, Are there any plans to support RFC3576, more particularly the disconnect message? I would like to see it implemented for traffic volume control. Please don not tell me to write the code myself as I am not a programmer David - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http