On 26/03/2013 18:03, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
o.k. many thanks for this phil. I'll probably have a bash at this but, as I've
done it before, just setting up radiator as something that just says yes/no
sounds a lot easier :-))
RADIATOR on Windows can use which is a direct access t
Hi,
> o.k. many thanks for this phil. I'll probably have a bash at this but, as
> I've done it before, just setting up radiator as something that just says
> yes/no sounds a lot easier :-))
RADIATOR on Windows can use which is a direct access to AD method
and doesnt use SAMBA
stuff at all - y
Alex Sharaz wrote:
> Well, I was running Radiator for a couple of years authenticating users
> against AD.
Yes... I didn't say that wouldn't work.
> ( sent out a snippet from the Radiator manual in another message) so I guess
> it wasn't using ntlm.
The text you posted showed it used ntl
On 26 Mar 2013, at 15:47, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Alex Sharaz wrote:
>> o.k. many thanks for this phil. I'll probably have a bash at this but, as
>> I've done it before, just setting up radiator as something that just says
>> yes/no sounds a lot easier :-))
>
> I doubt it.
>
Actually I found th
On 26 Mar 2013, at 15:00, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 26/03/2013 14:21, Alex Sharaz wrote:
>> Hi., I've been running ntlm_auth to authenticate our 802.1x users
>> against AD for a number of months without problems…… until this
>> morning when our Systems group tightened up auth requirements to only
Alex Sharaz wrote:
> o.k. many thanks for this phil. I'll probably have a bash at this but, as
> I've done it before, just setting up radiator as something that just says
> yes/no sounds a lot easier :-))
I doubt it.
The problem is with AD, not with any RADIUS server. And that the
ntlmv2 p
Phew!
o.k. many thanks for this phil. I'll probably have a bash at this but, as I've
done it before, just setting up radiator as something that just says yes/no
sounds a lot easier :-))
Rgds
Alex
On 26 Mar 2013, at 15:27, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 26/03/2013 15:09, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> On 26/03
On 26/03/2013 15:09, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 26/03/2013 15:00, Phil Mayers wrote:
You should ask on the Samba lists - if a windows domain member can do
it, there must be a newer API/RPC which Samba could implement.
In fact, a couple of minutes with google gives me this thread:
https://lists.sa
On 26/03/2013 15:00, Phil Mayers wrote:
You should ask on the Samba lists - if a windows domain member can do
it, there must be a newer API/RPC which Samba could implement.
In fact, a couple of minutes with google gives me this thread:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2012-March/166440.h
On 26/03/2013 14:21, Alex Sharaz wrote:
Hi., I've been running ntlm_auth to authenticate our 802.1x users
against AD for a number of months without problems…… until this
morning when our Systems group tightened up auth requirements to only
use NTLMv2. and my ntlm_auth module started failing
As
Alex Sharaz wrote:
> I've been running ntlm_auth to authenticate our 802.1x users against AD for a
> number of months without problems…… until this morning when our Systems group
> tightened up auth requirements to only use NTLMv2. and my ntlm_auth module
> started failing
Which breaks RADIUS
Hi.,
I've been running ntlm_auth to authenticate our 802.1x users against AD for a
number of months without problems…… until this morning when our Systems group
tightened up auth requirements to only use NTLMv2. and my ntlm_auth module
started failing
I'm running FR van 2.2 and samba Vsn 3.6.3
12 matches
Mail list logo
