Fechete Raul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thank you for your answer. that might just be it! :-) i have a test
> client also programmed by a colleague, that starts a number of threads (for
> each authorization one) that in the beginning wait for a semaphore. after
> all threads are ready, the semap
Fechete Raul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what bothers me is that the
> freeradius is handling such a small amount of authorizations, and keeping
> the processor usage below 10%. (?!) why doesn't it take 90% and do in the
> mean time more work?
It's limited by how fast the packets are being sent
Title: Re: freeradius performance & cpu usage
Nicolas Baradakis wrote:
>> what bothers me is that the freeradius is handling such a small
>> amount of authorizations, and keeping the processor usage below
>> 10%. (?!) why doesn't it take 90% and do
Fechete Raul wrote:
> what bothers me is that the freeradius is handling such a small
> amount of authorizations, and keeping the processor usage below
> 10%. (?!) why doesn't it take 90% and do in the mean time more work?
Perhaps the client doesn't send enough requests to make the server
busy. H
Title: freeradius performance & cpu usage
hello,
i have the following problem. i'm running freeradius (with the eap-sim module, and a special module a colleague of mine wrote) on a dual 3 ghz xeon, and all that i'm getting out of it are 25 (?) authorizations per secon
5 matches
Mail list logo