Re: freeradius performance & cpu usage

2005-07-18 Thread Alan DeKok
Fechete Raul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thank you for your answer. that might just be it! :-) i have a test > client also programmed by a colleague, that starts a number of threads (for > each authorization one) that in the beginning wait for a semaphore. after > all threads are ready, the semap

Re: freeradius performance & cpu usage

2005-07-18 Thread Alan DeKok
Fechete Raul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what bothers me is that the > freeradius is handling such a small amount of authorizations, and keeping > the processor usage below 10%. (?!) why doesn't it take 90% and do in the > mean time more work? It's limited by how fast the packets are being sent

Re: freeradius performance & cpu usage

2005-07-18 Thread Fechete Raul
Title: Re: freeradius performance & cpu usage Nicolas Baradakis wrote: >> what bothers me is that the freeradius is handling such a small >> amount of authorizations, and keeping the processor usage below >> 10%. (?!) why doesn't it take 90% and do

Re: freeradius performance & cpu usage

2005-07-18 Thread Nicolas Baradakis
Fechete Raul wrote: > what bothers me is that the freeradius is handling such a small > amount of authorizations, and keeping the processor usage below > 10%. (?!) why doesn't it take 90% and do in the mean time more work? Perhaps the client doesn't send enough requests to make the server busy. H

freeradius performance & cpu usage

2005-07-18 Thread Fechete Raul
Title: freeradius performance & cpu usage hello, i have the following problem. i'm running freeradius (with the eap-sim module, and a special module a colleague of mine wrote) on a dual 3 ghz xeon, and all that i'm getting out of it are 25 (?) authorizations per secon