Re: ldap redundant w/ ldap-group

2005-06-27 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
Dustin, thank you very much for this! It works like a charm, even though it is quite ugly... -JP On Fri Dec 10 2004 at 20:58:59 CET, Dustin Doris wrote: ... However, when I am using redundant, I cannot have this redundancy for Ldap-Group lookups. It appears that for Ldap-Group

Re: ldap redundant w/ ldap-group

2004-12-14 Thread Michael Griego
Yeah, I kinda like the way this is going. In a case like this, you could have the xlats registered with a group instead of with the server as a whole. Then, when you make a reference to an xlat'ed value, prefix it with the group and a colon (much like attribute references), ie myldap:LDAP-Group

Re: ldap redundant w/ ldap-group

2004-12-14 Thread Alan DeKok
Dustin Doris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, when I am using redundant, I cannot have this redundancy for Ldap-Group lookups. Yes. That's an issue. We should really have inter-section references in the config files, and fail-over for things like attributes groups. e.g. instantiate

ldap redundant w/ ldap-group

2004-12-10 Thread Dustin Doris
Hi All, I am in the process of rebuilding our servers to recent openldap and freeradius versions in our lab and when done will re-write the ldap howto, as I know its pretty outdated by now. Anyway, I've been playing around with using configurable failover for my ldap setup and ran into an issue.