Re[3]: limiting sessions

2006-11-10 Thread Andrew Long
... > DELETE FROM radius.usergroup WHERE GroupName = 'aroma' > THEN... > INSERT INTO radius.usergroup (UserName, CreationDate, GroupName) > VALUES ('username0001', (CURRENT_DATE), 'aroma'); > repeated for all 500 usernames... > I think this should work, as all the usernames in use are stored in

Re[2]: limiting sessions

2006-11-09 Thread Andrew Long
> On Thursday 09 November 2006 11:34, Andrew Long wrote: >> also ran >> >> SELECT >> `usergroup`.`UserName`, >> `usergroup`.`creationdate`, >> `usergroup`.`GroupName` >> from usergroup >> where username = '4aroma70370'; >> >> and that also comes up null... >> >> Does it make sense that radius is n

Re: limiting sessions

2006-11-09 Thread Kevin Bonner
* Try to respond just to the list and not me personally. I don't enjoy wading through duplicate messages. Thanks! On Thursday 09 November 2006 11:34, Andrew Long wrote: > also ran > > SELECT > `usergroup`.`UserName`, > `usergroup`.`creationdate`, > `usergroup`.`GroupName` > from usergroup > whe

Re[2]: limiting sessions

2006-11-09 Thread Andrew Long
> On Thursday 09 November 2006 11:00, Andrew Long wrote: >> Here is the output from radiusd -X regarding the answer to an >> auth-request from one of the properties where I changed >> session-timeout to 1800. It does not look to me like the >> session-timeout attribute is being sent... any suggesti

Re: limiting sessions

2006-11-09 Thread Kevin Bonner
On Thursday 09 November 2006 11:00, Andrew Long wrote: > Here is the output from radiusd -X regarding the answer to an > auth-request from one of the properties where I changed > session-timeout to 1800. It does not look to me like the > session-timeout attribute is being sent... any suggestions?

Re[7]: limiting sessions

2006-11-09 Thread Andrew Long
>> Andrew Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I tried Session-Timeout but it doesn't seem to do the job. >> So... is it being sent back to the NAS? If it is, then the NAS is >> ignoring it. Go ask your NAS manufacturer for a refund, or for a >> firmware upgrade that implements RADIUS. >> Al

Re: Re[5]: limiting sessions

2006-11-09 Thread Alan DeKok
Andrew Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How would you suggest I verify the session-timeout is actually being > sent/received? tcpdump / wireshark? Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog - List info/subscribe

RE: Re[5]: limiting sessions

2006-11-09 Thread Seferovic Edvin
Sent: Donnerstag, 09. November 2006 14:51 To: Alan DeKok; FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re[5]: limiting sessions > Andrew Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I tried Session-Timeout but it doesn't seem to do the job. > So... is it being sent back to the NAS? If

Re[5]: limiting sessions

2006-11-09 Thread Andrew Long
> Andrew Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I tried Session-Timeout but it doesn't seem to do the job. > So... is it being sent back to the NAS? If it is, then the NAS is > ignoring it. Go ask your NAS manufacturer for a refund, or for a > firmware upgrade that implements RADIUS. > Alan D

Re: Re[3]: limiting sessions

2006-11-08 Thread Alan DeKok
Andrew Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried Session-Timeout but it doesn't seem to do the job. So... is it being sent back to the NAS? If it is, then the NAS is ignoring it. Go ask your NAS manufacturer for a refund, or for a firmware upgrade that implements RADIUS. Alan DeKok. -- ht

Re[3]: limiting sessions

2006-11-08 Thread Andrew Long
> Andrew Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I need to boot users at one property after a specified time period. >> We have adjusted the "max-daily-session" to "1800" (30 minutes), >> but users still seem to be staying on. Can someone point me in the >> right direction. The NAS is a Colubris cn3000.

Re[2]: limiting sessions

2006-11-07 Thread Andrew Long
> Andrew Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I need to boot users at one property after a specified time period. >> We have adjusted the "max-daily-session" to "1800" (30 minutes), >> but users still seem to be staying on. Can someone point me in the >> right direction. The NAS is a Colubris cn3000.

Re: limiting sessions

2006-11-07 Thread James Wakefield
er attribute we have that may apply is "max-acct-age". I am pretty new to this, so any detail is most appreciated. The NAS should support Session-Timeout, which is the most common method of time-limiting sessions. If not, hit the vendor with a big cluebat, as it's in

Re: limiting sessions

2006-11-07 Thread Alan DeKok
Andrew Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to boot users at one property after a specified time period. > We have adjusted the "max-daily-session" to "1800" (30 minutes), > but users still seem to be staying on. Can someone point me in the > right direction. The NAS is a Colubris cn3000. Wh

limiting sessions

2006-11-07 Thread Andrew Long
I need to boot users at one property after a specified time period. We have adjusted the "max-daily-session" to "1800" (30 minutes), but users still seem to be staying on. Can someone point me in the right direction. The NAS is a Colubris cn3000. The other attribute we have that may apply is "max-