This is very clear.Thanks.
--- On Mon, 2/22/10, Doug Hardie wrote:
From: Doug Hardie
Subject: Re: modules instantiation
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Date: Monday, February 22, 2010, 10:56 PM
I tried to correct the wiki's description but was not able to do so. I c
I tried to correct the wiki's description but was not able to do so. I can log
in fine and it says I can edit the file. However, after making the changes
save just gives a blank screen and the changes never appear in the text.
In the modules2 file change:
The xxx_instantiate module is called
Thankyou will try that.
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Alan DeKok wrote:
From: Alan DeKok
Subject: Re: modules instantiation
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 6:07 PM
Latha Krishnamurthi wrote:
> I see that a new instance is getting created when the
ion for each thread, I have no
> place to store the instance specific data ? I need to have a global pool and
> lock it with mutex ?? (looks like rlm_ldap does something similar ?)
Alan responded with something I was not aware of. I suspect thats the way you
need to go.
>
> Tha
Latha Krishnamurthi wrote:
> I see that a new instance is getting created when the first one is busy
> handling a request. (I do this this by adding a sleep in the module and
> printing the threadid) I am expecting the xxx_instantiate function to
> get called each time a new instance is created (re
_ldap does something similar ?)
Thanks in advance
LK
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Doug Hardie wrote:
From: Doug Hardie
Subject: Re: modules instantiation
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 3:49 PM
On 19 February 2010, at 15:24, Latha Krishnamurthi wrote
On 19 February 2010, at 15:24, Latha Krishnamurthi wrote:
>
> I am using the free radius 2.1.3. I have a module rlm_xxx and have
> initialized it as thread safe. I have configured the start_servers as 3. The
> issue I am having is as follows.
>
> I see that a new instance is getting created w
Hi,
I am using the free radius 2.1.3. I have a module rlm_xxx and have initialized
it as thread safe. I have configured the start_servers as 3. The issue I am
having is as follows.
I see that a new instance is getting created when the first one is busy
handling a request. (I do this this b
Pedro Figueiredo wrote:
> as you can see, it's off by one. any suggestions or ideas on why it's
> doing this?
It's not off by one. Read it again.
It prints out the configuration items BEFORE it prints out that it
successfully instantiated the module.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingrad
On 2 Apr 2007, at 14:51, Pedro Figueiredo wrote:
> On 2 Apr 2007, at 13:38, Alan DeKok wrote:
>> Pedro Figueiredo wrote:
>>> i need to send different lns configuration in a round-robin fashion.
>>> in order to do this, i added the following to modules:
>>>
>>> files rra {
>>>
Pedro Figueiredo wrote:
> one suggestion for the future, though: can freeradius complain when
> it finds an unknown keyword?
As always, patches are welcome.
But part of the issue is philosophy: The configuration file format is
very forgiving, which avoids a lot of problems. Occasionally it
On 2 Apr 2007, at 13:38, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Pedro Figueiredo wrote:
>> i need to send different lns configuration in a round-robin fashion.
>> in order to do this, i added the following to modules:
>>
>> files rra {
>> userfile = ${confdir}/users.rr1
>
> It's "usersfile
Pedro Figueiredo wrote:
> i need to send different lns configuration in a round-robin fashion.
> in order to do this, i added the following to modules:
>
> files rra {
> userfile = ${confdir}/users.rr1
It's "usersfile", with an "s". "users" + "file".
Alan DeKok.
hi all,
i need to send different lns configuration in a round-robin fashion.
in order to do this, i added the following to modules:
files rra {
userfile = ${confdir}/users.rr1
acctusersfile = ${confdir}/acct_users
preproxy_usersfile =
14 matches
Mail list logo
