Re: num_answers_to_alive

2011-08-04 Thread Alan DeKok
Stefan Winter wrote: > the configuration of 2.1.10 has the parameter num_answers_to_alive in > proxy.conf. Looking at the source code, I found that instead, in > realms.c, the config option num_pings_to_alive is used. num_answers is > read from the config, but never referenced.

RE: num_answers_to_alive

2011-08-04 Thread Gary Gatten
half Of Alexander Clouter Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:20 AM To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Subject: Re: num_answers_to_alive Stefan Winter wrote: > > The documentation says that 3..10 are *useful* ranges, but doesn't > mention that everything else is forbidden. In par

Re: num_answers_to_alive

2011-08-04 Thread Alexander Clouter
Stefan Winter wrote: > > The documentation says that 3..10 are *useful* ranges, but doesn't > mention that everything else is forbidden. In particular, I would like > to use 1, not 3. The idea is: the server was dead before, but now it > managed to send a reply back - so it must have been fixed.

num_answers_to_alive

2011-08-04 Thread Stefan Winter
Hi, the configuration of 2.1.10 has the parameter num_answers_to_alive in proxy.conf. Looking at the source code, I found that instead, in realms.c, the config option num_pings_to_alive is used. num_answers is read from the config, but never referenced. If that's the case, then the config o