Re: pap always returns noop for windows dialup authentication [solved]

2013-09-24 Thread paul trader
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 at 22:03, Phil Mayers opined: PM:Carefully examine the two entries on line 1 and 172, determine what's PM:different, examine the unredacted data in the packets, and correct it. hi phil - thanks for the advice, i figured out that placement of the $INCLUDE statement (and

Re: pap always returns noop for windows dialup authentication [solved]

2013-09-24 Thread Alan DeKok
paul trader wrote: hi phil - thanks for the advice, i figured out that placement of the $INCLUDE statement (and user info in general) in the users file is important for windows authentication. strangely enough, it doesn't seem to matter for a linux dialup, though. That is a *terrible*

Re: pap always returns noop for windows dialup authentication [solved]

2013-09-24 Thread paul trader
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 at 10:36, Alan DeKok opined: AD: It also contradicts your previous messages. You claimed you put the AD:users file entry at line one of the file. But now you talk about a AD:$INCLUDE statement. AD: AD: So... which is it? hi alan - well, i did both. at first the

Re: pap always returns noop for windows dialup authentication [solved]

2013-09-24 Thread Alan DeKok
paul trader wrote: hi alan - well, i did both. at first the $INCLUDE was put at the bottom of the users file, and there was 1 entry in the included file, at line 1. Why do you have a $INCLUDE? You did NOT mention it in your other posts. The help here presumes that you accurately