Re: [Freerdp-devel] Exit codes and singleton mode

2011-03-09 Thread Mads Kiilerich
On 03/09/2011 06:09 PM, eduardo fiss beloni wrote: > Here it is. The patch which makes xfreerdp end with the last thread's return > as the program exit code. Please comment. It would be nice to have some documentation of what it was intended to do and what it should return in which situations.

Re: [Freerdp-devel] Exit codes and singleton mode

2011-03-09 Thread eduardo fiss beloni
--- On Mon, 7/3/11, Otavio Salvador wrote: > From: Otavio Salvador > Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Exit codes and singleton mode > To: "Jay Sorg" > Cc: "freerdp" > Date: Monday, 7 March, 2011, 1:02 > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 02:30, Jay > Sorg > wrote: > >> Returning reasonable exit codes is much

Re: [Freerdp-devel] -lm needed

2011-03-09 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > On 03/09/2011 01:09 PM, eduardo fiss beloni wrote: >> Hi, >> >> --- On Sun, 6/3/11, Marc-André Moreau  wrote: >> >>> I added it in cunit and dfbfreerdp after they wouldn't build because >>> of the missing ceil function. Looking at the previou

Re: [Freerdp-devel] cruft

2011-03-09 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 16:00, Adilson Oliveira wrote: > Good reason to move to launchpad/bazaar? ;) > > /me runs! /me catch Adilson and slaps him! Personally I had bad experience with Bazaar and I do prefer gitorious. -- Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...

Re: [Freerdp-devel] cruft

2011-03-09 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 15:54, Marc-André Moreau wrote: ... > I have been thinking about it for a while, what would you guys think of > switching from the sourceforge.net git repository to gitorious.org? It would > make things easier for maintaining two git repositories under the same > project. I'

Re: [Freerdp-devel] libfreerdputils

2011-03-09 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 15:20, Vic Lee wrote: > I think it's quite difficult to promise a stable or backward-compatible > API/ABI without significantly rewrite the current API. MS will just keep > adding new feature in the future and every time we implement a new > feature it will be easily break t

Re: [Freerdp-devel] cruft

2011-03-09 Thread Adilson Oliveira
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Em 09-03-2011 12:57, Marc-André Moreau escreveu: > As for multiple git repositories on sourceforge.net > , why am I not even surprised to find this: > http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/ticket/902 > > It's not support

Re: [Freerdp-devel] cruft

2011-03-09 Thread Marc-André Moreau
As for multiple git repositories on sourceforge.net, why am I not even surprised to find this: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/ticket/902 It's not supported on sourceforge.net On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Marc-André Moreau < marcandre.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > For the wireshark

Re: [Freerdp-devel] cruft

2011-03-09 Thread Marc-André Moreau
For the wireshark dissector, I meant "should *NOT* be included in make dist" On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Marc-André Moreau < marcandre.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mads > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > >> We have the following files that (for good reasons) isn't

Re: [Freerdp-devel] cruft

2011-03-09 Thread Marc-André Moreau
Hi Mads On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > We have the following files that (for good reasons) isn't a part of what > we distribute with "make dist". Much of it is unused, outdated and broken. > > Is it OK to remove them? Archaeologists will be able to find them in the > re

[Freerdp-devel] cruft

2011-03-09 Thread Mads Kiilerich
We have the following files that (for good reasons) isn't a part of what we distribute with "make dist". Much of it is unused, outdated and broken. Is it OK to remove them? Archaeologists will be able to find them in the repo history anyway. channels/rdpdr/smartcard/scard.c channels/rdpdr/smart

Re: [Freerdp-devel] libfreerdputils

2011-03-09 Thread Vic Lee
I think it's quite difficult to promise a stable or backward-compatible API/ABI without significantly rewrite the current API. MS will just keep adding new feature in the future and every time we implement a new feature it will be easily break the compatibility. To provide an ideal API/ABI comp

Re: [Freerdp-devel] cmake?

2011-03-09 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:48, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > Some time ago it was proposed to switch to cmake. > > AFAIK some work was done on it but nothing was published. > > What is the status? Unfinished. My current branch is available at http://gitorious.org/+ossystems-hackers/freerdp/ossystems-ha

Re: [Freerdp-devel] libfreerdputils

2011-03-09 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:46, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > I think it is important that we have the freedom now to freely make > refactorings and cleanups now and break both binary and source > compatibility. That will be the fastest way to get something that is stable. I don't disagree but this is so

Re: [Freerdp-devel] [PATCH] libfreerdp orders: replace floating point math with bit operation

2011-03-09 Thread eduardo fiss beloni
-- On Tue, 8/3/11, Otavio Salvador wrote: > From: Otavio Salvador > Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] [PATCH] libfreerdp orders: replace floating > point math with bit operation > To: "Mads Kiilerich" > Cc: freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Tuesday, 8 March, 2011, 22:50 > On Tue, Mar 8, 2

[Freerdp-devel] cmake?

2011-03-09 Thread Mads Kiilerich
Some time ago it was proposed to switch to cmake. AFAIK some work was done on it but nothing was published. What is the status? /Mads -- Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best

Re: [Freerdp-devel] libfreerdputils

2011-03-09 Thread Mads Kiilerich
On 03/09/2011 01:31 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > More or less. What we need to support is the public API/ABI and the > plugins and like can be changed if it does not affect the used API/ABI > of the "public" library. > > My concern is about exactly that. We are starting to delivery FreeRDP > on dis

Re: [Freerdp-devel] libfreerdputils

2011-03-09 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:15, Mads Kiilerich wrote: >> I fully agree about it however it would be nice if we keep it as a >> static library to avoid needing to control so many ABI >> compatilibities. This is a nightmare to be aware of possible ABI >> breakage in many libraries and we need to keep

Re: [Freerdp-devel] [PATCH] libfreerdp orders: replace floating point math with bit operation

2011-03-09 Thread eduardo fiss beloni
--- On Tue, 8/3/11, Jay Sorg wrote: > Eduardo added it with the multi* orders but I'm sure he > won't mind if > we change it.  He probably just wanted to get it > working quick. You are quite right Jay. I really don't mind. > Don't forget to remove the #include too if > it's there. > > Jay

Re: [Freerdp-devel] -lm needed

2011-03-09 Thread Mads Kiilerich
On 03/09/2011 01:09 PM, eduardo fiss beloni wrote: > Hi, > > --- On Sun, 6/3/11, Marc-André Moreau wrote: > >> I added it in cunit and dfbfreerdp after they wouldn't build because >> of the missing ceil function. Looking at the previous commits, I >> noticed the -lm option, so I added it just so t

Re: [Freerdp-devel] -lm needed

2011-03-09 Thread eduardo fiss beloni
Hi, --- On Sun, 6/3/11, Marc-André Moreau wrote: > I added it in cunit and dfbfreerdp after they wouldn't build because > of the missing ceil function. Looking at the previous commits, I > noticed the -lm option, so I added it just so they would build. When > was this introduced and why do we

Re: [Freerdp-devel] libfreerdputils

2011-03-09 Thread Mads Kiilerich
On 03/09/2011 02:46 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 20:54, Marc-André Moreau > wrote: >> I started a new library, called libfreerdputils, intended to be used for >> utilities. I have started it by moving the semaphore utils from xfreerdp to >> the library. This should help kee