Hi,
i installed freerdp on my machine running kubuntu 10.04 LTS. When i try
to start from console, i get this error message:
xfreerdp: error while loading shared libraries: libfreerdp.so.0: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
During install i saw no error. What can i do?
On 06/21/2011 02:15 PM, Marc-André Moreau wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Otavio Salvador
> mailto:ota...@ossystems.com.br>> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 15:06, Marc-André Moreau
> mailto:marcandre.mor...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> > I have just proposed hiring a law
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 15:06, Marc-André Moreau
> wrote:
> > I have just proposed hiring a lawyer as a way to resolve this conflict,
> how
> > about we wait until Peter replies to that? As I said, we can keep going
> on
> > forever like t
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 15:06, Marc-André Moreau
wrote:
> I have just proposed hiring a lawyer as a way to resolve this conflict, how
> about we wait until Peter replies to that? As I said, we can keep going on
> forever like this, since none of us is a lawyer. If we all agree to get a
> lawyer in
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 14:39, Marc-André Moreau
> wrote:
> > Otavio:
> > Please do not take this as an opportunity to come back on the decision of
> > choosing the Apache license. This has been discussed already, and there's
> no
> > way
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 14:39, Marc-André Moreau
wrote:
> Otavio:
> Please do not take this as an opportunity to come back on the decision of
> choosing the Apache license. This has been discussed already, and there's no
> way we're backing off at this point.
You both are trying to convince me; t
Otavio:
Please do not take this as an opportunity to come back on the decision of
choosing the Apache license. This has been discussed already, and there's no
way we're backing off at this point.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 14:29, Gerry Reno
On 06/21/2011 01:34 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 14:29, Gerry Reno wrote:
> ...
>
>>> This is the first commit found in our GIT repository and it is still
>>> present in more then 30 files around the code. This can be find using
>>> git blame in every file.
>>>
>>> So th
Hi Peter,
Both of us have remained quiet while others keep fighting, but I don't think
it is necessary to continue this way.
Here's what I propose:
Since none of us are real lawyers, we can go on like this forever. I will
work on getting the necessary funding for hiring a real lawyer, who will
c
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 14:29, Gerry Reno wrote:
...
>> This is the first commit found in our GIT repository and it is still
>> present in more then 30 files around the code. This can be find using
>> git blame in every file.
>>
>> So this is still rdesktop code.
>>
> For which the authors have ag
On 06/21/2011 01:21 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 13:53, Gerry Reno wrote:
> ...
>
>>> The point here is not if it is good or not but if it is possible or
>>> not to change license without Cendio's agreement. I think it is not.
>>>
>> I don't get why you say this.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 13:53, Gerry Reno wrote:
...
>> The point here is not if it is good or not but if it is possible or
>> not to change license without Cendio's agreement. I think it is not.
>
> I don't get why you say this.
>
> If the Cendio code has been removed from the new codebase then i
On 06/21/2011 12:43 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:46, Marc-André Moreau
> wrote:
>
>> Going back to actual facts, the announcement of the license change
>> corresponds with a sudden increase in interest towards the project.
>> I have received a lot of highly positive f
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:46, Marc-André Moreau
wrote:
> Going back to actual facts, the announcement of the license change
> corresponds with a sudden increase in interest towards the project.
> I have received a lot of highly positive feedback regarding the license
> change: companies involved
Going back to actual facts, the announcement of the license change
corresponds with a sudden increase in interest towards the project.
I have received a lot of highly positive feedback regarding the license
change: companies involved in this field obviously prefer Apache over GPL,
that's what I ca
On 06/21/2011 11:21 AM, Adilson Oliveira wrote:
> Em 21-06-2011 12:02, Gerry Reno escreveu:
>
>
>> If he has some specific complaint, let's see it. What code, what file?
>>
> Let's calm down and try not get sucked into that. As you said yourself
> nobody wins. I have contact with Peter for
Em 21-06-2011 12:02, Gerry Reno escreveu:
> If he has some specific complaint, let's see it. What code, what file?
Let's calm down and try not get sucked into that. As you said yourself
nobody wins. I have contact with Peter for about 6 years (he may not
remember that) and he was always been hon
On 06/21/2011 10:51 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> This doesn't mean they cannot put someone in court, does it?
>
>
That's something that can happen to any project, at any time.
And it's a very rare thing indeed. It's enormously expensive to
successfully prosecute a case.
I've been involved in
Em 21-06-2011 11:51, Otavio Salvador escreveu:
> This doesn't mean they cannot put someone in court, does it?
And who said the suit would be open there? Let's say Cendio decided to
go after a developer who reside in USA? In that case that would be USA law.
[]s
Adilson.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:51, Gerry Reno wrote:
> The original author of the codebase is one of the authors who has agreed
> to the new license.
>
> All other works were based on this work.
>
> As such in this particular instance it does not matter so much that
> people have touched the original
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:48, Marc-André Moreau
wrote:
>> The questio is: which law? It varies from country to country.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but Cendio AB is based in
> Sweden: http://www.cendio.com/aboutus/contact/
> When I think of "Sweden" and "copyright" in the same sentence, I'm thin
On 06/21/2011 10:15 AM, Adilson Oliveira wrote:
> Em 21-06-2011 11:08, Gerry Reno escreveu:
>
>
>> Many of these have had to excise some portions of code for authors
>> who did not want their contribution in the commercial offering.
>>
>> And once you have excised that code and have a clean code
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:29, Gerry Reno wrote:
> No, the burden of proof is on the entity that is claiming there was a
> license violation. Not the other way round.
>
> And the courts are fairly lenient with new codebases. You can look at
> any number of examples. SCO's failed lawsuit against
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Adilson Oliveira wrote:
> Em 21-06-2011 11:17, Jürgen Lüters escreveu:
>
> > My post was a reaction toward Peters post. He claimed that a clean room
> > implementation is the only way to replace the gpl based software parts.
> > The law does not require this. The
Em 21-06-2011 11:17, Jürgen Lüters escreveu:
> My post was a reaction toward Peters post. He claimed that a clean room
> implementation is the only way to replace the gpl based software parts.
> The law does not require this. The law, and the technical experts
> reviewing this, expecting a differe
Em 21-06-2011 11:08, Gerry Reno escreveu:
> Many of these have had to excise some portions of code for authors
> who did not want their contribution in the commercial offering.
>
> And once you have excised that code and have a clean codebase you can
> make any further modifications you wish to t
On 06/21/2011 10:21 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:08, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> On 06/21/2011 09:56 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>>> I have some friends that are from GNU and it does matter if the code
>>> has been changed using a previous code as reference. It is a
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:08, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 09:56 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> I have some friends that are from GNU and it does matter if the code
>> has been changed using a previous code as reference. It is a difficult
>> stuff to be discussed in jury but it can happen.
Hello,
* Otavio Salvador [20110621 15:54]:
> It seems that the only way to solve this is Cendio and their people
> allowing us to change license.
or stick with GPLv2 or later ...
> Start from scratch seems stupid for me.
it would be.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kotes - co...@c-base.or
Am Dienstag, den 21.06.2011, 10:56 -0300 schrieb Otavio Salvador:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:13, Jürgen Lüters
> wrote:
> > Copyright law does protect implementations only, not ideas nor
> > algorithms. Implementations do manifest itself in terms of sourcecode.
> > As long a the sourcecode (the
On 06/21/2011 09:56 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
> I have some friends that are from GNU and it does matter if the code
> has been changed using a previous code as reference. It is a difficult
> stuff to be discussed in jury but it can happen.
>
> The only safe way to avoid this is to reconstruct t
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:59, Andreas Kotes wrote:
> or stick with GPLv2 or later ...
Yes; GPLv2 is better due the patents clause of GPLv3.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:13, Jürgen Lüters
wrote:
> Copyright law does protect implementations only, not ideas nor
> algorithms. Implementations do manifest itself in terms of sourcecode.
> As long a the sourcecode (the implementation) is different everything is
> ok. The implementation is not d
Hi,
My name is Jürgen. I am not a lawyer but a public certified IT expert in
Germany. I have served in copyright cases several times as a technical
expert (welte versus router manufacturers) and others.
Copyright law does protect implementations only, not ideas nor
algorithms. Implementations do
Hi,
i´m having a little trouble with the rdpdr option again.
Whenever i try to upload larger files to my Win 2008 R2 SP1, the CPU
load on my machine jumps to 100% while freerdp spits out an endless
stream of "SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE" and doesn´t react to input anymore
until i kill it from another sh
35 matches
Mail list logo
