Hi,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Niklas Andersson wrote:
> Out or curiosity - are these nightly builds based on FreeRDPmaster? I
> couldn't see any tags with 2.0 on Github.
the nightly builds are based on master which is the base for 2.0.
> Also, do you plan to tag a 2.0 build f
Thanks tons for your work Bernhard,
Out or curiosity - are these nightly builds based on FreeRDPmaster? I
couldn't see any tags with 2.0 on Github.
Also, do you plan to tag a 2.0 build for inclusion in Debian?
Best regards and thanks,
Niklas
On 11/01/16 10:45, Bernhard Miklautz wrote:
> Hi
2016-01-11 10:45 GMT+01:00 Bernhard Miklautz
:
> For me the error looks like the repo wasn't added correctly to the
> sources list.
Oops, you are right, sorry.
I forgot to replace 'DIST' in the url.
Thank you,.
--
Site2
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 08:56:44AM +0100, Valerio Pachera wrote:
> 2016-01-11 8:55 GMT+01:00 Valerio Pachera :
> > apt-get update
> >
> > Err http://pub.freerdp.com freerdp-nightly/main i386 Packages
> > 404 Not Found [IP: 212.232.26.215 80]
> >
> > The repository
> >
>
> I was writing tha
2016-01-11 8:55 GMT+01:00 Valerio Pachera :
>
>
> apt-get update
>
> Err http://pub.freerdp.com freerdp-nightly/main i386 Packages
> 404 Not Found [IP: 212.232.26.215 80]
>
> The repository
>
I was writing that the repository is not working right now.
I tried on a debian wheezy and a jessie.
-
2015-12-18 16:50 GMT+01:00 Bernhard Miklautz
:
> For users and for testing we do have nightly pre-builds for some time:
>
> https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/wiki/PreBuilds
>
apt-get update
Err http://pub.freerdp.com freerdp-nightly/main i386 Packages
404 Not Found [IP: 212.232.26.215 80]
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 04:12:47PM +0100, Valerio Pachera wrote:
> Hi, I opned a bug report to point out that the last stable release is more
> than 2 years old and that many commit has been pushed since then.
> https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/issues/3008
.. there are multiple issues open r
Hi, I opned a bug report to point out that the last stable release is more
than 2 years old and that many commit has been pushed since then.
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/issues/3008
I hope this is the right place to talk about it.
Could you tell me why you dind't relase 1.2 release after so
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Bernhard Miklautz
wrote:
> @Otavio if I'm not mistaken you do use serial a lot could you provide some
> information how one can
> properly test it's functionality or do you even have some test list in place?
Yes; we can help with how to test it, in case someone
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:24:56AM +, Javid Nia / Mod2 Inc. wrote:
> As a user of freerdp project and a fellow software developer I want to thank
> the code writers behind freerdp.We all know it takes a serious amount of
> time to write quality software. Rome was not built in one
[mailto:marcandre.mor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:00 PM
To: brian mullan
Cc: freerdp-devel
Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Stable release
Hi Brian,
This is a good idea. It is clear that many community members have come to
perceive things in ways that shouldn't be, and we ne
Hi Brian,
This is a good idea. It is clear that many community members have come to
perceive things in ways that shouldn't be, and we need to fix that. This
conversation has already degenerated enough and it's not helping anyone.
I just want to assure people there is no takeover, there is no cons
It's understandable that this is an opensource project and that you need to
make a living aswell, so it makes sense that the project has began to cater
to thinstuffs needs. I just wan't to warn you that letting thinstuff
control the project though is definitely a bad idea.
It is truly shocking tha
I don't have a stake in this very passionate discussion on the alias but
with many years
in the technical world I would suggest that Email is absolutely the worst
way to talk out
issues like this.
Typing out emails leaves out context that a voice discussion could easily
help facilitate.
People mi
Hi Jay,
I think you are living in a parallel universe, what is wrong with you? Come
on IRC more often and talk to us, you've lost touch with reality, seriously.
First, don't use "GPL-like" to refer to a license which has nothing to do
with the GPL. You know how I feel about the GPL and we're defi
I had a similar problem when I was using FreeRDP libraries in xrdp.
The API kept changing from day to day for things that add no value.
palette renamed to colorTable, then ColorTable
This breaks the API twice. What value was added?
The API needs to be a special place that one guy maintains and o
Thanks Marc and Vic.
I'm only trying to explain why there are not as many contributors as there was.
When any project gets too close to any company you loose contributor.
We spent a lot of time switching to the Apache lincese but we allow
GPL like code from one company. Why?
Can other companies
Hi Arlo,
Thank you for your feedback, and you are right, it can be very hard to stay
in sync with the bleeding edge of FreeRDP. In this case, the stable branch
of FreeRDP may be better suited for you. If you base your work on the
stable branch, you won't be getting new features as as fast as they
There are something I want to talk.
I and my company really want to push back many bug fix and new features
back to FreeRDP (like we did with USB redirection). But there is a big
issue that cause us stop to merge code to FreeRDP mainline. You guys change
API and architecture too often.
The first t
Hi Vic,
Thank you for your support, and you do summarize well the situation.
We have always been very inclusive of people's contributions and always
will be. As for enjoying the new code without complaining and fixing
problems which bother you, that's pretty much how this should be
approached. I'
Hi Jay,
I am sorry you feel that way. I still remember when you and Marc invited
me to leave rdesktop and join FreeRDP because rdesktop was controlled by
Cendio and refused any architetural changes even they were useful or
necessary. And Marc said FreeRDP would be much more open. This has been
Hi Jay,
There's nothing to "fix" as there has never been a takeover. Where did you
get that from?!
And honestly, the comparison with Cendio is very insulting, you know how I
feel about them.
FreeRDP remains under my control, Thinstuff is *not* taking control over
the FreeRDP project. If I were a
Hi Otavio,
I think you also need to take a step back and realize the following:
I have already acknowledged that you do bring valid points. It is not not a
good thing that certain features like serial, parallel and smartcard are
not as stable as they should be, and would definitely use a helping
Hello folks,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Bernhard Miklautz
wrote:
> first of I'm truthfully sorry how it went with xrdp. Even if I wasn't
> directly involved I absolutely understand you and also think some not
> really right choices were made.. Sorry for that.
I think Marc-Andre and ThinStu
Hi Jay,
first of I'm truthfully sorry how it went with xrdp. Even if I wasn't
directly involved I absolutely understand you and also think some not
really right choices were made.. Sorry for that.
That said,
On 10/23/2013 09:48 AM, Jay Sorg wrote:
> What do I think?
>
> I left rdesktop in Peter
When we are talking about this, you mention Thinstuff.
What do I think?
I left rdesktop in Peter's control and Cendio took over.
I left FreeRDP is your control and Thinstuff took over.
You need to fix this!
Jay
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Marc-André Moreau
wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> I unders
I'm sorry, you missed the point.
Jay
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Bernhard Miklautz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/23/2013 06:26 AM, Jay Sorg wrote:
>> I'm concerned / confused about the future of FreeRDP.
>> It seems like there is too many restructuring / refactoring of the
>> source code that ad
Hi,
On 10/23/2013 06:26 AM, Jay Sorg wrote:
> I'm concerned / confused about the future of FreeRDP.
> It seems like there is too many restructuring / refactoring of the
> source code that add no value.
> All the documentation on
> http://www.freerdp.com/api/
> is out of date.
True. Have a look to
Hi Jay,
I understand you are not in agreement with certain architectural decisions.
However, they are not "adding no value" to the FreeRDP project, they are
quite useful. WinPR has greatly enhanced the portability and reusability of
the code.
As for the "lots of complaints" and "developers being
I would like to express my concern too over the stability of FreeRDP.
It was much better a year ago.
I'm concerned / confused about the future of FreeRDP.
It seems like there is too many restructuring / refactoring of the
source code that add no value.
All the documentation on
http://www.freerdp.c
Hello Marc-Andre,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Marc-André Moreau
wrote:
> All of this being said, I actually do care about fixing serial, parallel and
> smartcard. I'm quite happy to see Thinstuff's been putting some resources on
> smartcard and serial recently, and that Nik who responded ear
Hi Otavio,
All of this being said, I actually do care about fixing serial, parallel
and smartcard. I'm quite happy to see Thinstuff's been putting some
resources on smartcard and serial recently, and that Nik who responded
earlier in this thread is now on IRC, ready to help. I think the most
probl
Hi Otavio,
You may not realize it, but the vast majority of the work I'm doing for
customers is upstream from the start, and this include bug fixes,
performance improvements, architectural fixes. The problem I think you have
is the features you care mostly about (serial, parallel, smartcard) are
t
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Marc-André Moreau
wrote:
> I understand that this is constructive criticism, the issue is mostly with
> the fact that one cannot realistically do what you suggest. Freezing master
> is not an option, which is why we've made a stabilization branch: the code
> there
Hi Otavio,
I understand that this is constructive criticism, the issue is mostly with
the fact that one cannot realistically do what you suggest. Freezing master
is not an option, which is why we've made a stabilization branch: the code
there is simply stabilized over time with no breaking changes
Hello Bernhard,
First I'd like to make clear it is not a criticism per si, but a
constructive critic.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Bernhard Miklautz
wrote:
> as Marc-Andre already said we are short on time and man power.
> Since the last release a lot of new features and clients where added,
Hi Otavio,
as Marc-Andre already said we are short on time and man power.
Since the last release a lot of new features and clients where added,
the code base and functionality is growing.
One really big and hard problem we face is the complexity of RDP. It
ain't an easy job to test all features.
-Original Message-
> From: Marc-André Moreau [mailto:marcandre.mor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:37 AM
> To: Otavio Salvador
> Cc: freerdp-devel
> Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Stable release
>
> Hi Otavio,
>
> I understand the lack of a proper
Developer
-Original Message-
From: Marc-André Moreau [mailto:marcandre.mor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:37 AM
To: Otavio Salvador
Cc: freerdp-devel
Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Stable release
Hi Otavio,
I understand the lack of a proper release cycle is an issue, but to
Hi Otavio,
I understand the lack of a proper release cycle is an issue, but to solve
this I really need the help of the community. We've got a lot of people
doing an amazing job fixing bugs and backporting fixes to the stable-1.1
branch. The problem is that working on the release and fixing bugs o
Hello folks,
I am quite concerned about the future of FreeRDP. We have many "more
or less" working features and last stable release has been a while
ago.
Personally I've been having a lot of issues with FreeRDP with features
not working file (serial redirection, smart card redirection and so
on)
41 matches
Mail list logo
