Hi Mads,
On 04/21/2011 12:28 AM, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> But it all follows from how we have tcp.c as a part of libfreerdp and
> thus have hardcoded that we use tcp sockets. tcp.c is however also the
> part of libfreerdp that has most platform specific code (plus the
> ui_select callback - whateve
On 2011-04-20 19:21 , Bengt-Arne Fjellner wrote:
I have to retract one thing said earlier. OpenSSH now has support for
socks4a so that too will be included in this "packet".
This seems to be official since OpenSSH 5.2.
/baf
Bengt-Arne Fjellner
On 2011-04-20 18:37 , Marc-André Moreau wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
>
> On 04/20/2011 04:55 PM, Vic Lee wrote:
> > Hi Mads,
> >
> > I agree to have it in FreeRDP, but I do *not* agree to have it in
> > libfreerdp. That's two diffe
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 04:55 PM, Vic Lee wrote:
> > Hi Mads,
> >
> > I agree to have it in FreeRDP, but I do *not* agree to have it in
> > libfreerdp. That's two different thing. libfreerdp is the core library
> > that implement the core RDP protoc
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:55, Vic Lee wrote:
...
> This should be done as an extension through extensions. We can create a
> folder extensions/socks4, then the extension should be loaded like this:
...
I still prefer to have it externally of freerdp client. It can even be
a project inside freerd
On 04/20/2011 04:55 PM, Vic Lee wrote:
> Hi Mads,
>
> I agree to have it in FreeRDP, but I do *not* agree to have it in
> libfreerdp. That's two different thing. libfreerdp is the core library
> that implement the core RDP protocol. If SOCKS4 got built in, should
> SOCKS5? HTTP proxy? SSH tunnel? U
Hi Mads,
I agree to have it in FreeRDP, but I do *not* agree to have it in
libfreerdp. That's two different thing. libfreerdp is the core library
that implement the core RDP protocol. If SOCKS4 got built in, should
SOCKS5? HTTP proxy? SSH tunnel? Unix socket? That's messing up the
readibility
If I'm not mistaken, this patch should also be helpful in order to add
support TS gateway services?
I've been lurking here for a few months eagerly waiting for support as my
workplace uses it, and there is not a single OSX or Linux RDP app out there
to support it. If freerdp were to support TS Gat
On 2011-04-20 14:52 , Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> On 04/19/2011 01:03 PM, Bengt-Arne Fjellner wrote:
>> Hi I would like to add support for tunneling over a socks connection.
>> This is a first draft to show how it could be used.
>> I have not done any work (yet) on argument passing since this needs to
On 04/19/2011 01:03 PM, Bengt-Arne Fjellner wrote:
> Hi I would like to add support for tunneling over a socks connection.
> This is a first draft to show how it could be used.
> I have not done any work (yet) on argument passing since this needs to
> be discussed how it should look.
>
> This is on
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 23:39, Vic Lee wrote:
> This reminds me of the extension for XPUnlimited. Maybe it's better to
> be done through an extension as well? There are so many different ways
> of proxy or tunnel a connection, I don't think it's a good idea to touch
> the core for every one of the
Hi,
This reminds me of the extension for XPUnlimited. Maybe it's better to
be done through an extension as well? There are so many different ways
of proxy or tunnel a connection, I don't think it's a good idea to touch
the core for every one of them. Maybe others have some comments.
Vic
On 04
Hi I would like to add support for tunneling over a socks connection.
This is a first draft to show how it could be used.
I have not done any work (yet) on argument passing since this needs to
be discussed how it should look.
This is only tested on OSX but should work fine on any unix.
Might work
13 matches
Mail list logo
