Hi,
I have some questions (sent to me by someone else, actually) about
freesurfer output from make_cortex_table.csh.
1. Do integrated_rectified_mean_curvature
integrated_rectified_Gaussian_curvature refer to the shape/arc of the
surface of the cortex either before or after inflation? Or are
nothing unless you specify -conform.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Fornito, Alexander
wrote:
Hi,
Just wandering if someone could tell me what converting to mgh or mgz actually
does to the image. COR changed it to 256x256x256, 1mm3, what happens with
mgz/mgh?
Thanks,
Alex
1. Of whatever surface you specify (white by default I think).
2. Yes.
3. Easy enough to do in matlab I guess.
Bruce
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Michele Perry wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions (sent to me by someone else, actually) about
freesurfer output from make_cortex_table.csh.
1. Do
I see the following statement printed several times through the recon-all
processing and when I try to manipulate images in scuba. Is this something I
can safely ignore?
INFO: Volume /tmp/mritotal_5799/nu_8_dxyz.mnc cannot be found.
Thanks,
Satra
___
Hi Folks,
I tried running the latest make_average_subject script (and the
make_average_surface/volume scripts) using the expected command line syntax
and after hitting enter it immediately exits to the csh without error, but
does not produce anything.
make_average_subject --subjects SC010 SC011
try running it with --debug and send us the output
Brian Schweinsburg, Ph.D. wrote:
Hi Folks,
I tried running the latest make_average_subject script (and the
make_average_surface/volume scripts) using the expected command line syntax
and after hitting enter it immediately exits to the csh
I ran it with make_average_subject --debug \
--subjects SC010 SC012 ...
I also tried it with --echo. It provides no output.
I checked the script and it is executable. I looked through the code and
everything seems reasonable given my system except the part that says:
if person = brian; exit 0
HI,
I'm finishing a study I completed using an older version of freesurfer
(20040218), and have noticed that I get different values for surface area and
grey matter volume when using mris_anatomical_stats for my labels depending on
whether I use the mris_anatomical_stats that it is part of
