mri_convert file.mgh file.mnc
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Pellegrini, Stefano
(NIH/NINDS) [F] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I know that the mgh/mgz format is quite new and there is not much documentation
around, yet. I was wondering if there is some procedure already implemented to
convert this format to
Hi everybody,
I know that the mgh/mgz format is quite new and there is not much documentation
around, yet. I was wondering if there is some procedure already implemented to
convert this format to something else, let's say minc format.
thanks a lot,
-stefano
Which tool are you using to measure the label area?
Frida Polli wrote:
but there are label areas not clusters
On Friday, March 10, 2006, at 08:39 AM, Doug Greve wrote:
When you use average7, it turns off "fixing of vertex area", which
makes the clusters bigger. The end result, as you've not
Sasha,
See also the new files in your $FREESURFER_HOME/average directory:
mni305.cor.mgz
mni305.cor.readme
The mgz file can be used as the Talairach target with tkregister2.
Nick
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 10:08 -0500, Sasha Wolosin wrote:
> Dear all,
> I noticed that there is no talairach sub
stable3-pub is the same as stable3, minus a few items not meant for public
distribution.
for nmr center users, freeze stable3.
> Hi,
>
> in /usr/local/freesurfer/, there is stable3 and stable3-pub. What is the
> difference between these two; our group is interested in freezing a copy
> but not su
Hi,
in /usr/local/freesurfer/, there is stable3 and stable3-pub. What is the
difference between these two; our group is interested in freezing a copy
but not sure which one to pick.
Thanks,
Vasanth Pappu
--
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@n
but there are label areas not clusters
On Friday, March 10, 2006, at 08:39 AM, Doug Greve wrote:
When you use average7, it turns off "fixing of vertex area", which
makes the clusters bigger. The end result, as you've noticed, is that
the cluster area is about right :).
doug
Frida Polli
I am re-sending an email that Doug wrote earlier this week, as it was a
thorough description of some pretty important changes to the average
subject and talairach subject.
There is a new average subject to replace average7 that ALSO replaces the
talairach subject. It is called "fsaverage" and
Dear all,
I noticed that there is no talairach subject included in the new
release subject's directory. Is the talairach subject no longer needed?
Or must it be downloaded separately?
Thanks!
Sasha
Disclaimer:
The materials in this e-mail are private and may contain Protected Health
Informa
When you use average7, it turns off "fixing of vertex area", which makes
the clusters bigger. The end result, as you've noticed, is that the
cluster area is about right :).
doug
Frida Polli wrote:
hi doug
what i thought you said in this email is that the surface area of
average7 is sma
hi doug
what i thought you said in this email is that the surface area of
average7 is smaller that it should be. however, when i ran label_area
with average7 vs. fsaverage, average7 has bigger SAs for the two labels
i tried. am i misunderstanding something? again, this is only two
labels, and
11 matches
Mail list logo
