Re: [Freesurfer] mri_convert - 256^3 voxels at 1mm^3

Hi Darren, the input volume doesn't have to be, but they will be made 1mm iso 256^3 right after motion correction. The coordinate system hasn't changed. Bruce On Fri, 5 May 2006, Darren Weber wrote: Hi Bruce etal, It appears that the new 3.0.2 version of freesurfer does no longer requir

Re: [Freesurfer] medial pial rh and lh surfaces crossing

no, they aren't constrained across hemis, although of course they should be. On Fri, 5 May 2006, Josh Snyder wrote: I see this on a ton of datasets. Is it a known issue? Is there an easy correction? Thanks, Josh ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurf

[Freesurfer] Re: atlas

Hi Velentina, which one you use really depends on what part of the cortex you're interested in. Christophe's is more detailed, Ron and Rahul's is a bit more interested in medial temporal lobe. cheers, Bruce On Fri, 5 May 2006, Durastanti, Valentina (NIH/NINDS) [F] wrote: Hi, I have a q

[Freesurfer] mri_convert - 256^3 voxels at 1mm^3

Hi Bruce etal, It appears that the new 3.0.2 version of freesurfer does no longer require volumes to be 256^3 voxels at 1mm^3 each. Is there a wiki page on revised coordinate systems for the MRI and surface data? I would prefer to continue working with 256^3 @ 1mm^3 voxels (some other software

[Freesurfer] medial pial rh and lh surfaces crossing

I see this on a ton of datasets. Is it a known issue? Is there an easy correction? Thanks, Josh ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

[Freesurfer] atlas

Hi, I have a question about the two atlas (Desikan-Killiany and Christophe) now available in free-surfer: I was wondering if there is anything published already on cortical thickness of different regions of the brain selected according with each one of the atals. If so, I would love to compare t

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_ms_fitparms

why do you want parameter maps? What acquisitions do you have? On Fri, 5 May 2006, adam walczak wrote: Ok. Thanks. So what would the data I use to make the parameter maps also work for the reconstruction pipeline? Adam Bruce Fischl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: you don't need it at all if you

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_ms_fitparms

Ok. Thanks.  So what would the data I use to make the parameter maps also work for the reconstruction pipeline? AdamBruce Fischl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: you don't need it at all if you have T1 weighted data. Only if you're interested in the parameter maps themselves.BruceOn Thu, 4 May 2006, ada