[Freesurfer] corpus callosum mask

2009-03-24 Thread Al-Radaideh Ali
Dear FreeSurfer Experts, I wonder if Freesurfer saves the mask of corpus callosum or not. If so, could you please tell me where it is saved or how can I get a cc mask? Many thanks Ali This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses

Re: [Freesurfer] corpus callosum mask

2009-03-24 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Ali, yes, we segment the cc and save it in the aseg.mgz divided into 5 parts anterior/posterior. cheers, Bruce On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Al-Radaideh Ali wrote: Dear FreeSurfer Experts, I wonder if Freesurfer saves the mask of corpus callosum or not. If so, could you please tell me where it

[Freesurfer] FDR correction

2009-03-24 Thread Lars M. Rimol
Hi, I have done an analysis involving three groups, so there are three pairwise comparisons across two hemispheres = 6 p-maps. I want to adjust for multiple comparisons (across the vertices), so I use FDR. But since FDR determines the threshold basd on the actual p-values, I get 6 different treshol

Re: [Freesurfer] FDR correction

2009-03-24 Thread Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior
Some links that may be helpful: http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/QdecMultipleComparisons http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/GroupAnalysis http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/MultipleComparisons Hope it helps. PPJ ---

RE: [Freesurfer] FDR correction

2009-03-24 Thread Lars M. Rimol
Well, I believe there is a problem in principle here. FDR deals with multiple comparisons across the surface (or brain volume), but how do you deal with a series of such analyses? Of course, if you use a different method of correction you avoid this problem but that's not the point. LMR Dat

[Freesurfer] Incorrect correspondence in the aparc+aseg.mgz volume?

2009-03-24 Thread Ryan Scotton
Hi FreeSurfers, After a months of QC'ing FreeSurfer results, my team and I are now working toward end stage analysis of our cortical thickness data. All along, we have been aiming to make improvements in the wm.mgz volume so that we can assure that the white matter and gray matter surfaces are as

Re: [Freesurfer] Incorrect correspondence in the aparc+aseg.mgz volume?

2009-03-24 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Ryan, what version are you using? And when you say "bad" what exactly do you mean? Can you send some snapshots? If you're doing a thickness study the aparc+aseg is irrelevant - just the white and pial surfaces matter (and the spherical registration of course) cheers Bruce On Tue, 24 Mar

[Freesurfer] New Tutorial Attachments

2009-03-24 Thread Jeff Sadino
Hello, I wanted to review the FreeSurfer attachments on the wiki's tutorial page http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial Whenever I try to click on an attachment, it brings me to a page and says: Attached FilesNo attachments stored for FsTutorial/April2009CourseSchedule You are no

Re: [Freesurfer] New Tutorial Attachments

2009-03-24 Thread Nick Schmansky
Jeff, We haven't yet uploaded the latest slides for a course we are running in April, which the main FsTutorial page points at. You can get slides and wiki links from our most recent course here: http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/BrazilCourseSchedule Nick On Tue, 2009-03-24 a