Hi,
I have two short questions concerning motion correction using preproc-sess and
registration files
1) Running preproc-sess using per-session as e.g. like this
preproc-sess -per-session -fwhm 0 -sliceorder siemens -surface vpID lhrh -s
vpID -fsd bold -mni305
should result in a "fmc" output st
Hi,
Thank you for your suggestions Doug and Dan. Moving my subjects directory
outside of the freesurfer tree and deleting the symbolic link and then
recreating it as per the instructions at www.freesurfer.net/fswiki/FsAverage
seem to have sorted the problem.
Best wishes,
Clare
__
Charlotte,
There is no difference, from a statistical perspective, of nuisance
factors and covariates.
The key questions are:
(1) Do any of these covariates have a differential effect on thickness
between groups?
(2) Do you want to compare the actual group means or the
covariate-adjusted group me
Thank you Allison, however, I checked the website and it is said that
FreeSurfer transform the orig volume to the MNI305 atlas, so the spatial
normalization in FreeSurfer is still done in volume space but not in
surface space, right?
Best,
Xiangyu
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Allison Stevens
Dear All,
1)I would like to know what is the best way in catching the uncorrected
clusters results from the sig.mgh for a structural study:
Should I use the:
mri_glmfit-sim \
--glmdir lh.GroupAnalysis_Thickness_15.glmdir \
--cache 2 pos \
--cwpvalthresh .99 \
--overwrite
But in this case I
Hi Jimmy, I think the problem, if you can call it that, is with
fslview. Below is from our FAQ. See if that makes sense.
doug
Q. Why would the orientation of my scans look wrong after
processing my DICOM files with 'mri_convert'?
A: It can be misleading to check orien
Yes, since it appears fine when I open it with tkmedit. But once I apply a
flirt transformation I get the same image on tkmedit than the one on
fslview. I tried to flip the image but it won't change anything since the
brain is cut.
Also, I followed the same steps on my colleagues machine and it wor
Hi,
we´re running FS 5.1 and have a data set with a lot of missing values.
There are different subsets of persons missing different values of
interest, and we´re running analyses on concat files. mri_glmfit not
qdec). Is there anyway we can run analyses w/ missings in the fsgd file?
Best
Hi,
I am trying to find a way to get the segmentation/cortical label (to determine
corresponding brain structures) in MNI space for a cluster for which I know the
MNI coordinates. How can I do this?
Many thanks.
Antonella___
Freesurfer mailing list
You could register T1.mgz to MNI 1mm, invert the transformation and then map
the cluster in MNI to Freesurfer space.
Best,
Martijn
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
Op 24 feb. 2012 om 22:19 heeft Antonella Kis het volgende
geschreven:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to find a way to get the segmentatio
Oh, the problem may be in your label2vol cmd. Try this one
mri_label2vol --seg
~/Documents/freesurfer/subjects/pre_al_t1/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz --temp
~/Documents/freesurfer/subjects/pre_al_t1/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz --o
~/Documents/freesurfer/subjects/pre_al_t1/mri/aparc+aseg_t1ref.mgz
--regheader ~/
Dear Freesurfer Experts,
Would it be easier to upload a typical example of the data I am trying to
salvage, in order to get some hints on how I might proceed with this
problem of loss of frontal signal drop off ?
Thanks in advance.
Mahinda
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Mahinda Yogarajah wro
Hi Mahinda,
I can take a look if you want to upload a dataset. Please find
the instructions to upload in this wiki.
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FtpFileExchange
Thanks,
Sita.
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Mahinda Yogarajah wrote:
Dear Freesurfer Experts,
Would it be easier to upload
Hi,
I am noticing that when I use ‘mri_label2vol --annot’ it is not creating the
final label from the color table file. I tried using the --thresh 1 option, but
that didn't work either. i.e...
mri_label2vol --annot lh.custom.annot --temp ../mri/orig.mgz --o
custom_lh.nii.gz --subject FREESURF
Hi -
I would really like to use a volume size greater than 256^3.
I know of all the options and reasons.
what I want is a white matter surface than has fairly evenly spaced nodes
that are in approximate match to the voxels they enclose.
the reason is to seed, track and target using FSL surface
sorry - re this:
in principle, is freesurfer particularly sensitive to the orientation of
the brain? It might fit in 256^3 if I rotated it. then I could rotate the
surfaces back when I import to CARET.
It was, actually, rather hard to get a good surface last time. it seemed
that freesurfer needed
16 matches
Mail list logo