Hi Hassan
the only thing you can do is visually inspect the surfaces for accuracy
cheers
Bruce
On
Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Hassan bakhshi wrote:
Hi,
Finally I could run recon-all with nifti files, dicom couldnt run
it showed that recon-all done without errors, but how can i be sure about
the
thanks, its working like you suggested!
Im wondering if you have any idea how I can minimize this effect within subcortical areas since, youre right, DTI space has bigger voxels. Im thankful for any suggestion !!
Tom
Gesendet:Mittwoch, 15. April 2015 um 15:14 Uhr
Von:Douglas Greve
Sorry, I misread your previous email as Indeed BPM does do Clusterwise
correction. instead of Indeed BPM doesn't do Clusterwise correction.
The FWHM is the full-width-half-max and is a measure of the spatial
smoothness. This is always needed for cluster-wise correction. This is
usually
Ranjan,
You may want to try installing it on a local hard disk. Do you have
any scratch space you can use on the computer?
HTH,
D
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Ranjan Maitra
maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote:
Nick,
Thanks! It does match in the gzipped tarball:
~$ md5sum
Thank you Douglas for this detailed answer.
Matthieu
2015-04-15 15:19 GMT+02:00 Douglas Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
Sorry, I misread your previous email as Indeed BPM does do Clusterwise
correction. instead of Indeed BPM doesn't do Clusterwise correction. The
FWHM is the
Because resampling from 1.5 to 0.25 will generate a huge data.
Xiaomin
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:11:10 -0400
From: gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_vol2vol
But why do you need to have the same resolution as the
Hi Chris
we stopped developing tkmedit some years ago. Can you use freeview for
this instead?
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Chris Adamson wrote:
In tkmedit, if I use a tcl script with
SetBrushShape 3 0 1
The radius and shape are set to 3 and circular, respectively. However, the
But why do you need to have the same resolution as the original functional?
On 4/14/15 10:30 PM, Xiaomin Yue wrote:
yes, that's precisely what I want. the reason is the following. A
subject was scanned multiple times across days with slightly different
slice position for each time. What I
I would think that going into the DTI space would make this worse since
the voxels are bigger (?). But if that is what you want to do, use
mri_label2vol to map the aparc+aseg.mgz into the DTI space, then spec
that aparc+aseg in the mri_segstats cmd
doug
On 4/15/15 2:13 AM, Thomas Potrusil
Dear FS experts,
Can you please guide me how to create a binary mask of the left midbrain (VTA,
SN)?
Thanks for your help
Andre
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
oh, if you have no anatomical images then we can't help you
Bruce
On Wed, 15 Apr
2015, André Schmidt wrote:
Thanks Bruce. I'll try this.
The problem is I have no anatomical images for my subjects. What can I use as
input volume in mri_extract_label?
I want use this mask to extract time
Thanks Bruce. I'll try this.
The problem is I have no anatomical images for my subjects. What can I use as
input volume in mri_extract_label?
I want use this mask to extract time series afterwards.
Thanks again.
Best wishes
Andre
Von:
Hi Andre
you can use mri_extract_label to make a binary mask of anything we label.
Note that we don't explicitly label VTA or SN (yet), so you'll probably
need to use the brainstem label
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, André Schmidt wrote:
Dear FS experts,
Can you please guide me how to
p.s. sorry, maybe not brainstem, maybe ventral diencephalon
On Wed, 15
Apr 2015, André Schmidt wrote:
Dear FS experts,
Can you please guide me how to create a binary mask of the left midbrain
(VTA, SN)?
Thanks for your help
Andre
___
Freesurfer
Ranjan,
I installed Fedora21 onto a laptop. I then download and installed
freesurfer and, after installing a few basic packages (tcsh
libXcrnSaver), I was able to open freeview without any errors.
Which means the library not found issue you are encountering has
something to do with your local
Try using --vox instead of --crs
On 04/15/2015 01:44 PM, Lindsay Renae Wessel wrote:
Hello all,
I am running Qdec on a large number of subjects and trying to extract the
data from the plots generated by clicking find clusters and go to max. I
would like to export the data from the
Hello all,
I am running Qdec on a large number of subjects and trying to extract the data
from the plots generated by clicking find clusters and go to max. I would
like to export the data from the corresponding vertices.
I found the following line of code from an earlier, similar question
If one wanted to do a vertex by vertex thickness analysis for a group of
subjects in Matlab, which file in each freesurfer run would one want to use to
import into Matlab?
Eric Axelson
Department of Psychiatry
Iowa Neuroimaging
Hi Bronwyn
what is your goal? You won't ever get good surfaces there. Is it messing
stuff up elsewhere?
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Bronwyn Overs wrote:
Dear Freesurfer mailing list,
I am currently editing a scan (using fs version 5.3) and have come across a
section of the
?h.thickness in each subject's surf dir
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Axelson, Eric D
wrote:
If one wanted to do a vertex by vertex thickness analysis for a group of
subjects in Matlab, which file in each freesurfer run would one want to use
to import into Matlab?
Eric Axelson
Thanks! I now get the following error:
ERROR: Option out.dat unknown
The exact command I have entered (for vertex 33) is:
mri_segstats --i y.mgh --vox vertexno 33 --avgwf out.dat
Thanks again.
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Thanks Bruce.
Kind regards,
Bronwyn Overs
Research Assistant
Neuroscience Research Australia
Neuroscience Research Australia
Margarete Ainsworth Building
Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia
*M* 0411 308 769 *T* +61 2 9399 1883 *F* +61 2 9399 1265
neura.edu.au http://neura.edu.au
try
mri_segstats --i y.mgh --vox vertexno 33 0 0 --avgwf out.dat
On 4/15/15 6:41 PM, Lindsay Renae Wessel wrote:
Thanks! I now get the following error:
ERROR: Option out.dat unknown
The exact command I have entered (for vertex 33) is:
mri_segstats --i y.mgh --vox vertexno 33 --avgwf
Hi Bronwyn
I don't think there's anything to be done. The images don't carry enough
information to generate reliable estimates in those regions, so all you
can do is ignore them.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Bronwyn Overs wrote:
HI Bruce,
It isn't messing stuff up elsewhere, but I am
Dear FreeSurfer users,
Has anyone succeeded in running FreeSurfer 5.3 in a cloud processing system,
such as Amazon EC2?
I have seen prior posts in regard of FreeSurfer 5.1
(https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2011-November/021181.html),
but not for 5.3.
Regards,
Pedro Rosa.
Ok I will try freeview.
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2015 10:52 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] tkmedit SetBrushShape does not
HI Bruce,
It isn't messing stuff up elsewhere, but I am just worried about
including this participant in GLM analysis if this problem cannot be
fixed. What would you recommend?
Kind regards,
Bronwyn Overs
Research Assistant
Neuroscience Research Australia
Neuroscience Research Australia
Hi doug!
youre right, its working without --inv flag. But I have problems with partial volume effects within subcortical areas close to the ventricle. ADC values are falsified for some regions when using mri_segstats (especially caudate and putamen). I want to overcome this problem by resampling
Hi,
Finally I could run recon-all with nifti files, dicom couldnt run
it showed that recon-all done without errors, but how can i be sure about
the quality of the resultws.
I ran the tkmedit and tksurfer as the website said!
I got the stats too, how can i be sure that stats are correct
Hello Douglas,
Sorry if I haven't been clear. I'm trying to explain my needs :
1) I use the BPM toolbox to compute the GLM analysis as mri_glmfit would
do. However, outputs of this toolbox only give me beta maps and uncorrected
Tmaps.
2) With only these uncorrected Tmaps outputs, I'd like to
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I am reposting this question since I did not get an answer to my post from last
week.
We are using FLAIR images to refine pial surfaces. It generally performs
well, however in some cases there is still need for manual editing of
brainmask.
After manual
31 matches
Mail list logo