Hi Freesurfer Experts,I have tried to alter wiki example FSGD table into my
analyses these days, according to your advice, but there are still some
problems. Supposed there are 6 groups (maleclass1, maleclass2, maleclass3,
femaleclass1, femaleclass2, femaleclass3) and 2 Variables (age, education
Hi Ananth
we have regions in the LUT table (like the thalamic nuclei) that we don't
segment yet.
Sorry
Bruce
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Ananth Narayanan wrote:
> Hello freesurfer users,
>
> I am a new user of freesurfer. We are using FS to define ROIs for out PET
> analysis. I looked at the FS colo
Hi Annelinde
the problem is that your original image only includes about half the
cerebellum. We expect a full cerebellum and so the segmentation labels some
of the cortex that is superior to cerebellum incorrectly as cerebellu, then
removes it from the wm.mgz (since it isn't cerebral cortex).
Dear Bruce,
Thank you very much for letting me know. Indeed, something went wrong with
the slice prescription of that acquisition. I didn't know that would affect
segmentation. Our normal acquisition includes the whole brain.
Thanks again for to you and your support team!
Cheers,
Annelinde
2015-
Hi Doug,
Thanks for the response. I used the mri_label2label command:
mri_label2label --srclabel --s fsaverage --regmethod vol
--paint dmax --trglabel --hemi lh
When I input the output from this into mri_segstats as the --seg volume, I
get the error:
mri_read(): couldn't determine type of file
glad to hear it's not all your subjects!
Good luck
Bruce
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Annelinde
Vandenbroucke wrote:
Dear Bruce,
Thank you very much for letting me know. Indeed, something went wrong with the
slice prescription of that acquisition. I didn't
know that would affect segmentation. Our no
Hi Danielle, can you resubmit this email with the previous correspondence?
On 12/02/2015 01:14 PM, Danielle Miller wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thanks for the response. I used the mri_label2label command:
> mri_label2label --srclabel --s fsaverage --regmethod vol
> --paint dmax --trglabel --hemi lh
>
Sure -- should be all here now!
The last email contained the following text:
"Hi Doug,
>
> Thanks for the response. I used the mri_label2label command:
> mri_label2label --srclabel --s fsaverage --regmethod vol
> --paint dmax --trglabel --hemi lh
>
> When I input the output from this into mri_s
use --slabel, not --seg
doug
On 12/2/15 3:04 PM, Danielle Miller wrote:
Sure -- should be all here now!
The last email contained the following text:
"Hi Doug,
>
> Thanks for the response. I used the mri_label2label command:
> mri_label2label --srclabel --s fsaverage --regmethod vol
> --paint d
Hi all,
I'm sorry if this is a silly question, but what might cause the version of
Freesurfer to be different in the Subject and Current Stamps of the output
following autorecon2 and autorecon3? And is this a problem? The relevant lines
of output are as follows:
INFO: FreeSurfer build stamps do
10 matches
Mail list logo