Thanks so much!!
**
京都府立医科大学附属病院
精神科・心療内科
渡辺 杏里
**
Anri WATANABE, M.D.
Department of Psychiatry,
University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
You should just run mri_annotation2label on fsaverage and use the label
you want
On 08/03/2016 01:55 PM, miracle ozzoude wrote:
> Hello,
> i used mri_annotation2label to extract individual parcellations for my
> subjects. Do I need to register my subjects to fsaverage using
> mri_label2label
>> 6. Re: brain mask and T1 are not the same size (Douglas N Greve)
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:50:30 +
>> From: Isabelle Deschamps <isabelle.
Hi Bruce,
> You can't just change which peak is the WM - lots of things downstream would
> fail
That is unfortunate.
I've send you the subject files and the raw files via filedrop (per
these instructions
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FtpFileExchange)
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:38
If you passed DICOMS directly to recon-all, then the only place that
would have subject info would be the scripts/recon-all.log file; that
file would captures the conversion, and the subject name and date of
scan will show up there (might be some other info stored in the dicom
file that gets
Hi,
I'm involved in a project that requires anonymizing FreeSurfer data to remove
all patient information. I've found that the subject folder number is sometimes
included in text files and logs in a FreeSurfer folder. Is there any patient
information stored in any of the non-text files? Is
Hello,
i used mri_annotation2label to extract individual parcellations for my
subjects. Do I need to register my subjects to fsaverage using
mri_label2label before creating a mask for ROI surface based analysis
using GLM dods? Thanks
Best,
Paul
___
lle Deschamps <isabelle.deschamp...@ulaval.ca>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] brain mask and T1 are not the same size
To: "<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>"
<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Message-ID: <8f31a8f6-59c6-4d12-a2a4-2ef526465...@ulaval.ca>
Content
Society for the Study of Human Development:
>> http://www.sshdonline.org
>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
That's correct!
On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Anri WATANABE wrote:
Hi Anastasia,
Thank you for your kind explanation. I can be understanding how TRACULA tracts
white matter pathways.
At each position (in training subjects, not in new subjects of my data)
probability that next goes for
which
On 8/3/16 3:45 AM, Ajay Kurani wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thank you very much for your update regarding this issue.
1)Just curious, will LGI be included in this report as this is another
analysis of interest?
I was not planning to. The 809 subjects that I used for thickness do not
have lGI run on
what is your command line?
On 8/3/16 6:00 AM, Caroline Beelen wrote:
Dear FS,
An aparc.annot ctab file was created but I got the following error:
Colortable:aparc.annot.ctab
Annotname: myaparc
Nhitsfile nhits.mgh
Nlabels 6
Labeltresh 0 0.0
Loading freesurfer/fsaverage/surf/lh.orig
Hi Anastasia,
Thank you for your kind explanation. I can be understanding how TRACULA
tracts white matter pathways.
At each position (in training subjects, not in new subjects of my data)
probability that next goes for which direction to every labels in the
aparc+aseg (not with setting a certain
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2016-08-03 at 10.41.31 AM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 222427
Hi Doug,
Thank you very much for your update regarding this issue.
1)Just curious, will LGI be included in this report as this is another
analysis of interest?
2)As for the cortical thickness I originally used 15mm in the analysis so
based on your email I think using 5-10mm may be more
15 matches
Mail list logo
