Hi Doug,
Thanks for the prompt reply to what was essentially a 2-part question. Data
were processed in both fsaverage and native space for different reasons, which
is why I suggested the possibility of surface space incongruency on at the end,
which your reply seemed to make more likely. It
So the maximum is positive, but the mean is negative? When you look at
the uncorrected p-values, can you actually find this? My guess is that
the cluster must be largely negative, so I would report that
On 05/23/2018 03:52 PM, Pedro Rosa wrote:
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Dear
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Doug,
Many thanks.
I ran the analysis with 'abs', 'pos' and 'neg' testing.
All clusters (including the 'problematic' cluster on the
medialorbitofrontal region) are present in 'abs' and 'neg' testing
summaries, and not present in 'pos' testing
What you have described should work. The residuals will be in whatever
space the analysis was made in (mkanalysis-sess). What ROI are you
trying to get an average over? What are your mkanalysis-sess and
mri_segstats commands?
On 05/22/2018 10:26 PM, Mcnorgan, Christopher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
Do you mean gfeat? You can take the stack created by mris_preproc and
use that as input, but you won't be able to do clusterwise correction
for multiple comparisons
On 05/21/2018 02:20 PM, Rosalia Dacosta Aguayo wrote:
>
>
> Dear Experts,
>
> I would like to run statistical analyses with the
External Email - Use Caution
Any further advice on whether to include '-hippocampal-subfields-T1' flag in
the rerun after manual edits?
Jim
"The materials in this email are private and may contain Protected Health
Information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised
