External Email - Use Caution
For instance, if there is any way to extract spatial location of cluster X1
and use this location to extract thickness values of all the subjects from
P2 and P3, that way I can perform two-sample t-test. I am not sure if
that's feasible and if so, then
External Email - Use Caution
Hi experts,
I found a cluster X1, which showed significant difference in cortical
thickness between two groups C1 and P1, determined
using mris_preproc, mri_surf2surf and mri_glmfit commands.
I am interested in determining if the same cluster X1 has s
On 08/13/2018 03:02 PM, Ben M wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thank you very much for your response, it helped me a lot.
> I checked the examples of mri_vol2vol and for functional-to-structural
> registration I think I should do
>
> $ bbregister --t2 --lta /data/
External Email - Use Caution
Hello,
I notice that within TRACULA 6.0 that eddy_correct is used for the eddy
current correction. This is an older tool as compared to eddy, is there a
reason that eddy_correct is still used? Have you done cross comparisons
between eddy_correct and ed
And the downloads have finished successfully each time? Are you definitely
grabbing the tarball from
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/dev/freesurfer-linux-centos6_x86_64-dev.tar.gz?
Andrew
From: on behalf of Schumman Resonance
Reply-To: FS Help
Date: Saturday, August 1
asegstats2table is a python2 script, and you are likely running it with
python3. Try running the script with “python2” prepended to the command:
python2 asegstats2table --subjects $list --meas volume --skip --statsfile
wmparc.stats --all-segs --tablefile wmparc_stats.txt
best,
Andrew
From: o
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Doug,
Thank you very much for your response, it helped me a lot.
I checked the examples of mri_vol2vol and for functional-to-structural
registration I think I should do
$ bbregister --t2 --lta /data/bbregister/reg.lta --mov
/data/mean_func.nii.gz -
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Doug, it is kinetic modelling, not uptake. Thank you.
On Monday, August 13, 2018, 10:36:13 AM GMT+1, Shane Schofield
wrote:
Hello Petsurfers!
A few of my subjects ended up with vertices that had outlier PET values after I
followed the
Is this a kinetic modeling study or just an uptake?
On 08/13/2018 05:36 AM, Shane Schofield wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Hello Petsurfers!
>
> A few of my subjects ended up with vertices that had outlier PET
> values after I followed the PetSurfer steps. Most of the binding
Thank you!
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> oh, maybe we never got around to writing a write_patch.m. We'll put one
> together and send it to you
> Bruce
>
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2018, Dinicola, Lauren wrote:
>
> Hi Dr. Fischl,
>> Thank you so much for this response. This is a gr
External Email - Use Caution
Hello Petsurfers!
A few of my subjects ended up with vertices that had outlier PET values after I
followed the PetSurfer steps. Most of the binding potentials are in the range
of 0 - 3. Looking at the histogram though there are a couple of vertices wi
11 matches
Mail list logo