Re: [Freesurfer] Error: mri-glmfit-sim

2020-03-15 Thread Edith Botchway
External Email - Use Caution Yeah, that's the stage I'm working on. I did not download the patch. I'll try that. Thank you! Edith From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Douglas N. Greve Sent: Saturday, 14 March 2020 9:36 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

Re: [Freesurfer] longitudinal FreeSurfer help

2020-03-15 Thread Diers, Kersten /DZNE
External Email - Use Caution Hello Swati, a model with two random effects gives greater flexibility in modeling individual variation of the slopes. This is why it is recommended; but it is not strictly necessary. Sorry, I have to correct my response to your step #4 in my previo

[Freesurfer] Using Freesurfer with post contrast MRI

2020-03-15 Thread Hoang, Ricky
External Email - Use Caution Hello Freesurfer users, I have a general question regarding using freesurfer to process postcontrast MRI scans. I have tried to run recon-all with a few subject’s scans and there has been issues with the skullstripping as well as labeling high intens

Re: [Freesurfer] [External] Re: HP and thalamic subfield quality with a bad aparc segmentation {Disarmed}

2020-03-15 Thread Zeng, Victor (BIDMC - Keshavan - Psychiatry)
I have two follow up questions: For the HA longitudinal stream, would it be fine to not drop bad aparc scans based on their subfield qc in the timept their in? Also is there a longitudinal thalamic nuclei stream in development? Victor Zeng Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Keshavan Lab --

Re: [Freesurfer] HP and thalamic subfield quality with a bad aparc segmentation

2020-03-15 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Dear Victor, That’s a good question! We inform the estimation of the gray matter intensities with the median of the voxels segmented as GM in the main stream. Because the median is a robust statistic, the thalamic nucleia and hippocampal subfields should be fine. But yes, you’re definitely bette

[Freesurfer] HP and thalamic subfield quality with a bad aparc segmentation

2020-03-15 Thread Zeng, Victor (BIDMC - Keshavan - Psychiatry)
Hi all, >From my understanding from the log files, the subfield segmentations (and in >general the aparc.mgz) relies on the norm.mgz (which is based off the >brainmask.mgz). What if hypothetically, you have a not so good segmentation of >the cerebral cortex, but willing to individually qc the

Re: [Freesurfer] how to calculate the ROI volumes of grey matter using Desikan atlas

2020-03-15 Thread Kate Marvel
External Email - Use Caution Hi Thomas, Thanks for this. k On Sun, Mar 15, 2020, 8:51 AM Thomas Yeo wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > Hi Kate, > > The Desikan ROI volumes should be in the ?h.aparc.stats file after you run > recon-all. See Section 4.2 here ( >

Re: [Freesurfer] how to calculate the ROI volumes of grey matter using Desikan atlas

2020-03-15 Thread Thomas Yeo
External Email - Use Caution Hi Kate, The Desikan ROI volumes should be in the ?h.aparc.stats file after you run recon-all. See Section 4.2 here ( https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/AnatomicalROI#IndividualStatsfiles). Regards, Thomas On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 7

[Freesurfer] how to calculate the ROI volumes of grey matter using Desikan atlas

2020-03-15 Thread Kate Marvel
External Email - Use Caution Hi Freesurfer community, I would like to know how to compute the ROI volumes of grey matter using Desikan atlas? Is there a threshold value set for this? is it 0.2? Thanks kate ___ Freesurfer mailing list F