External Email - Use Caution
Douglas,
Thank you for your help. Another question. The FreeSurfer wiki states that for
version 5.2 and later, the brainstem is not included in the global measures of
volume because the amount of brainstem changes depending upon the field of view
of
Hi Ellen
It is certainly possible. Have you looked at the surfaces for those subjects?
Cheers
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
On Behalf Of Ellen Ji
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 5:44 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: [Freesurfer] Aborm
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Experts,
While the majority of our subjects have a folding index between 5-30,
there are a couple of *extreme* outliers in the thousands or even negative.
Could this hint that a particular part of recon-all failed and should be
rerun?
Thank yo
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Freesurfer experts,
As part of my project, I would need to have subthalamic nucleus as one of my
ROIs in which this is not available by Freesurfer. I found a probabilistic
subthalamic nucleus atlas in FSL atlases (in MNI152 space) and thought I
External Email - Use Caution
Hello FreeSurfer Developers,
I'm attempting to create a text file of amygdalar nuclei of given subjects. I
use this command:
asegstats2table --subjects 8070 8071 8077
--statsfile=amygdalar-nuclei.lh.T1.v21.stats
--tablefile=amygdalarnuclei.lh.T1.
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Andrew,
After speaking with our compute cluster service providers, it seems like this
error is due to FIPS being enabled on the cluster. Are there any existing
solutions to FIPS conflicts with FreeSurfer?
Thanks!
Katja
___
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Experts,
For our project work, we particularly looking for hippocampal and its
subfield volumes. Using GE 1.5T scanner, we tried a 3D BRAVO sequence with
1x1x1 resolution, 256x256x160 dimension with 8* flip angle which produced
images with a lot o
External Email - Use Caution
Thanks a lot, It works!, now I have obtained values to ctx and wm volumes
for each area. However when I look at the gray matter volume values
calculated by mri_anatomical stats, the results are pretty similar to the
ctx-ROIs calculated by mri_segstats,
