Did anyone else happen to see this ridiculous story on Gizmodo today?
http://gizmodo.com/5919149/your-brain-scan-looks-different-on-mac-and-pc
It cites the recent article "The Effects of FreeSurfer Version,
Workstation Type, and Macintosh Operating System Version on Anatomical
Volume and Cortical
e.mni305.nii
>
> If you did not create the register.dat with bbregister, I would strongly
> suggest it. It works really well on the partial volume files. If you do,
> you should specify your current register.dat as the init registration.
>
> doug
>
> Andrew Dumas wrote:
&
Hi,
I'm trying to move a bunch of partial FOV functional images (occipital
cortex only with oblique coronal slices) into common space. For each
subject, I have a registration file (register.dat) to register
functional images to anatomicals, and I'd like to incorporate the
talairach.xfm registratio
Hi everyone,
I'm using a frozen version of FS v4.0 and I have a subject with rather
large ventricles that don't get filled properly (surfaces and aseg are
off) during recon. I can't really find a good fix in previous messages
besides to upgrade FS, since it seems like the newer versions will
handl
Thanks, Doug-- that's what I was looking for!
Andrew
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:51 -0400, Douglas Greve wrote:
> Try using mri_surf2surf with the --sval-annot flag.
>
> doug
>
> On 4/5/11 11:20 AM, Andrew Dumas wrote:
> > Hi FreeSurfer experts,
> >
> > Is th
tices. This ruins the continuity of each individual label with little
islands of various values. Is there a mri_annot2annot or equivalent?
Thanks!
Andrew Dumas
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ma
Hi,
I've been looking through the mailing list archives for anything on
calculating BPF (Brain Parenchymal Fraction) and have only found some
fuzzy descriptions of how to calculate this using FreeSurfer. I know I
can get ICV from the aseg.stats, but how can I obtain the volumes of
total white and g
ers
> Bruce
>
> On Thu, 9 Dec
> 2010, Andrew Dumas wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm trying to partition a surface into a number of random but
> > roughly-equally sized areas, and I've been using the
> > "mris_make_face_parcellation" func
Hi!
I'm trying to partition a surface into a number of random but
roughly-equally sized areas, and I've been using the
"mris_make_face_parcellation" function to do this. Is it possible to
have a finer control over the sizes of each label it generates? I only
see 7 options in: $FREESURFER_HOME/lib/