Hi,
I would like to ask if the following procedure is
recommended when using FreeSurfer for (total) gray and
white matter volumetry, or if specific parameter
settings are known to optimize this task.
Default processing stream (recon-all -all) is used.
Data are visually inspected, and manual
Hi,
when loading the segmentated data into Matlab I get an
image containing four smaller subimages (see
attachment) instead of one (fullsize) that corresponds
to the original input dataset.
Does anybody know what went wrong?
Frederick
__
Do You
--noedit
mri_vol2vol --targ rawavg.mgz --mov orig.mgz --reg
reg.dat --o
orig-in-rawavg.mgz
If this does not work with your version of vol2vol,
then use the one here:
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/mri_vol2vol
Frederick Klauschen wrote:
Hi,
I have
Hi,
I have to bring up an issue again which we had some
discussion about before, but which we haven't yet
found
a satisfying solution. I would like pose my question a
little more precisely again:
1) I have a dataset that is in 181x217x181
coordinates.
2) I am processing it as follows:
,
Frederick Klauschen wrote:
Hi Bruce,
(aim: transform fs format back to original file
format)
when I run the commands you suggested:
mri_convert -rl orig/001.mgz brainmask.mgz
brainmask_transformed.mgz
the backtransformed image is in the original
coordinate boundaries
Hi Bruce,
(aim: transform fs format back to original file
format)
when I run the commands you suggested:
mri_convert -rl orig/001.mgz brainmask.mgz
brainmask_transformed.mgz
the backtransformed image is in the original
coordinate boundaries, but it is not a the same
position as the original data
Could you tell me the transformation vector that is
used to convert a e.g.(181x217x181) array to a FS
(256^3) array.
I would like to backtransform from FS to native space.
Thanks,
Fred
--- Doug Greve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which way do you want to go? Convert FS volumes back
into the
