External Email - Use Caution        

Dear Developers,

I am planning to run PVT (psychomotor vigilance task) in fMRI using event
related design. This is an extremely simple reaction time task: participant
has to respond to the appeared geometric shape as quickly as possible. The
key feature of this paradigm is that we will have fluctuating and quite
rapid event presentation times (ranging between 300 and 500 msec). Another
important information is that we will use FSL FEAT for the evaluation. We
decided to use opseq2 to optimize the design with the following parameters:

optseq2 --ntp 150 --tr 2 --psdwin 0 20 --ev evt1 1 45 --nkeep 3 --o exp
--nsearch 10000 --tnullmin 3 --tnullmax 11 --repvar 10

Although with this design I get quite satisfying efficiency and VRF scores
I do not understand that if I decrease dPSD why does it have significant
negative effect on efficiency and VRF. Could you explain this? If I
understand well, this is the only option to shift the onset of the event
from the scanning points, and I would assume that if there is fluctuation
in time between scanning points and stimuli presentation, it would help to
"catch" the hemodynamic response easier (if the stimulus onset always goes
together with the scans, we can always catch the same timepoints of the
HRF). Did I misunderstand something? If I use FSL that is based on HRF
estimation (and not on FIR), do these parameters (dPSD) and scores
(efficiency & VRF) have meaning and function at all? My last question is
related to event duration. Although I have fluctuating and short events, as
you can see I chose 1 sec (because it has to be the integer multiple of the
dPSD). Is it problematic?

Thank you for your suggestions,

Gergely

-----------------------------------------
Gergely Darnai PhD
Department of Behavioural Sciences
Medical School, University of Pécs
Phone: +36/72/536-256
Fax: +36/72/536-257
H-7624 Szigeti u. 12, Pécs, Hungary
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to