ork
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Thu, 4 May 2017, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> mris_sample_parc ${sub} \
>> lh ${targ}.nii.gz \
>> ${targ}_fs6_annot.annot \
>> -ct ${SUBJECTS_DIR}/${sub}/bla_test_table.txt
>>
>>
>> T
the mris_sample_parc command line. Can you just send it
> and the entire screen output?
> On Thu, 4 May 2017, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> That’s what I did below, see the script and log.txt attached to a previous
>> email. This is the output from the mris_sample_parc step
fwiw, this problem persists in FS6.0
-jared
> On May 4, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Jared P Zimmerman
> wrote:
>
> That’s what I did below, see the script and log.txt attached to a previous
> email. This is the output from the mris_sample_parc step
>
>>>>>&
ments changed
>>>>> pass 2: 0 segments changed
>>>>> writing annotation to s111_bla_8mm_orig2_annot.annot…
Thanks,
Jared
> On May 4, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
>
> can you try it with -ct
>
> and send us the output if that doesn't wor
Hey Bruce et al, any update on this?
Thanks,
Jared
> On Apr 28, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Jared P Zimmerman
> wrote:
>
> Here’s the script that I’m running and the merged stderr stdout. I’ve also
> tried various permutations of mris_sample_parc using the -t flag and using
> d
; Hi Jared
>
> can you send us the full command line and screen output?
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> Any chance I could get some help on this? still having this problem
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 6:26 PM,
Any chance I could get some help on this? still having this problem
> On Apr 20, 2017, at 6:26 PM, Jared P Zimmerman
> wrote:
>
> Hi FS Experts,
>
> I’m having trouble getting anatomical stats from a parcellation I made out of
> scanner-space volume ROIs. I have take
Hi FS Experts,
I’m having trouble getting anatomical stats from a parcellation I made out of
scanner-space volume ROIs. I have taken the following steps to do this.
mri_vol2vol --mov myROI.nii.gz --targ orig.mgz --regheader --o
myROI_orig.nii.gz --interp nearest
mris_sample_parc Subj111 lh myR
ys went to fsaverage space. Do you want to decimate the
> native space surfaces?
>
>
> On 09/29/2016 10:15 AM, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>> I want to project to the native subject surfaces though, not
>> fsaverage. If I use —trgsubject subjID would that work with the
>&
> Bruce
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> I want to project to the native subject surfaces though, not fsaverage. If
>> I use —trgsubject subjID would that work with the —icoorder flag?
>> Alternatively I guess I could project to fsaverage and th
> On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:00 AM, Douglas Greve wrote:
>
> you can actually skip the ico thing and just use --trgsubject fsaverage6
>
> On 9/28/16 7:06 PM, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>> Thanks Doug,
>>
>> This does seem like it will do the right thing, but it’s fai
Thanks Doug,
This does seem like it will do the right thing, but it’s failing because it’s
looking for /SUBJECTS_DIR/ico/ and I do not seem to have an ico subject in my
subjects_dir
Should this normally be in the subjects_dir? I don’t recall ever seeing this
made when I’ve run recon-all in th
12 matches
Mail list logo