If this is the reference, than I think based on the ls -l output, it
is a pretty good guess that it was version 4.1.7
Of course, like Zeke said, this is a complete guess, but based on
plausible information.
HTH
D
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Z K wrote:
> I think he's referring to the conven
I think he's referring to the convention used in the various
/usr/pubsw/packages libraries where "current" points to a version
number. For example as of right now:
/usr/pubsw/packages/fsl/current -> 5.0.7
But there is no real way of knowing the destination of that symlink at
May 1 2012. At lea
Other than someone's recollection, there is probably no verifiable means
for determining this information. Sending an inquiry to Martinos Center
Help Desk is your best bet.
-Zeke
On 03/31/2015 03:24 PM, Marco Loggia, PhD wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> If I wanted to find out what was the 'current' FSL
It may help to provide a bit more context e.g. the email/instructions
you where you found the reference to 'current' fsl version?
HTH,
D
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Z K wrote:
> Other than someone's recollection, there is probably no verifiable means
> for determining this information. Send
Hi all,
If I wanted to find out what was the 'current' FSL version at the Martinos
Center on May 1, 2012, how would i do it?
Thanks!
Marco
__
Marco L. Loggia, PhD
Assistant Professor of Radiology
Harvard Medical School
Massachusetts General Hospital
149 Thirteenth
