Re: [Freesurfer] Functional overlay on a surface - interpolation question

2012-06-03 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Shay, not necessarily. It depends what your goal is. --projfrac 0 for example will minimize the chances of an activation spreading across the banks of a sulcus. cheers Bruce On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Shay Ohayon wrote: Dear Bruce, I see, so you would recommend to use it with "--projfrac 0.5".

Re: [Freesurfer] Functional overlay on a surface - interpolation question

2012-06-03 Thread Shay Ohayon
Dear Bruce, I see, so you would recommend to use it with "--projfrac 0.5". Thanks for your help. -- Shay On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > Hi shay > Are you using mri_vol2surf to sample it onto the surface before displaying > in tksurfer? If so, you get to choose how to sam

Re: [Freesurfer] Functional overlay on a surface - interpolation question

2012-06-02 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi shay Are you using mri_vol2surf to sample it onto the surface before displaying in tksurfer? If so, you get to choose how to sample and interpolate? Cheers Bruce On Jun 2, 2012, at 9:43 PM, Shay Ohayon wrote: > Hi, > > I have another silly question. When a functional overlay (say, log

[Freesurfer] Functional overlay on a surface - interpolation question

2012-06-02 Thread Shay Ohayon
Hi, I have another silly question. When a functional overlay (say, log p-value map) is loaded to tksurfer, how exactly are the surface vertex values computed? using simple interpolation of the loaded map? or is it something more fancier, like looking along the normal of each surface face and takin