:00 PM
From: "Douglas N Greve"
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Fw: Re: surface based analysis for subcortical structures
Hi, I just found a bug in mri_glmfit-sim in regards to GRF on
volume-based data. I put a fixed version at the same location. Please
u
rograms? Your help is highly appreciated.
>> Thanks!
>> Jon
>> *on:* Friday, October 28, 2016 at 11:53 AM
>> *From:* "Douglas Greve"
>> *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Fw: Re: surface based analysis for
>> subcortic
is highly appreciated.
> Thanks!
> Jon
> *on:* Friday, October 28, 2016 at 11:53 AM
> *From:* "Douglas Greve"
> *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Fw: Re: surface based analysis for
> subcortical structures
>
> If you want to use GRF,
e: surface based analysis for subcortical structures
If you want to use GRF, then I should get you new versions of some of the programs as the volume-based GRF used the Friston 1994 algorithm that was not as accurate as the Worsley 1996 algorithm. I just updated my code last week (better late
why I want to use "mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir subc.glmdir --grf 3 pos --cwpvalthresh .0166"
Bests,
John
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 at 11:53 AM
From: "Douglas Greve"
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Fw: Re: surface based analysis for subcort
If you want to use GRF, then I should get you new versions of some of
the programs as the volume-based GRF used the Friston 1994 algorithm
that was not as accurate as the Worsley 1996 algorithm. I just updated
my code last week (better late than never:). But in the end, you
probably want to use
Thank you very much Doug,
The codes worked very well. I was using the wrong command to correct the data.
My command was
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir subc.glmdir --cache 1.3 pos --cwp 0.05 --3spaces
and for subcortical structures it must be
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir subc.glmdir --grf 3 pos --cwp
