Hi Dorsa
I don't see any holes in the thalamus in your aseg, nor separated pieces.
What voxel coords do you mean? Remember to look at the data in other
orientations. Things that look like islands in one view may be peninsulas
in anothers
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Dorsa Haji
I mean the holes in the thalamus and also some parts that are labeled as
thalamus but not attached to the rest of thalamus volume.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> what missing parts do you mean? The segmentation seemed pretty reasonable,
> but
what missing parts do you mean? The segmentation seemed pretty
reasonable, but the contrast wasn't good enough to say how accurate it
was in some places
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Dorsa Haji Ghaffari wrote:
Yes it is taken at 3T. I have asked our team to provide these information about
the
MRIs
Yes it is taken at 3T. I have asked our team to provide these information
about the MRIs and will let you know when I hear back. I also wanted to ask
if you know a good way to refine the thalamus and fill out the missing
parts within the volume?
Thank you
Dorsa
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:10 PM,
what is a "3TS" image? Do you mean it was acquired at 3T? What sequence
and what parameters (TE/TR/TI/TD/flip angle)?
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Dorsa
Haji Ghaffari wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
> that is a 3TS T1 weighted image and is taken after the patients have taken
> the contrast medium. I
Hi Bruce,
that is a 3TS T1 weighted image and is taken after the patients have taken
the contrast medium. I have played with the intensities in Analyze and this
is the best I could get. Do you have any suggestions for getting better
contrast?
Thank you
Dorsa
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:29 PM,