Re: [Freesurfer] Group Analysis - glmfit results

2022-09-06 Thread Douglas N. Greve
] Group Analysis - glmfit results [*CAUTION:* Non-UBC Email] Since this is longitudinal, I'm assuming that your contrast is actually something like contrast C = (INT2-INT1)-(CON2-CON1) where 1 and 2 the the time points. As you suggest, both (INT2-INT1) and (CON2-CON1) might both be less than 0

Re: [Freesurfer] Group Analysis - glmfit results

2022-09-05 Thread rstei...@student.ubc.ca
, 2022 12:45:22 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Group Analysis - glmfit results [CAUTION: Non-UBC Email] Since this is longitudinal, I'm assuming that your contrast is actually something like contrast C = (INT2-INT1)-(CON2-CON1) where 1 and 2 the the time points

Re: [Freesurfer] Group Analysis - glmfit results

2022-08-28 Thread Douglas N. Greve
Since this is longitudinal, I'm assuming that your contrast is actually something like contrast C = (INT2-INT1)-(CON2-CON1) where 1 and 2 the the time points. As you suggest, both (INT2-INT1) and (CON2-CON1) might both be less than 0, but if INT is less negative than CON, then C will be

[Freesurfer] Group Analysis - glmfit results

2022-08-23 Thread rstei...@student.ubc.ca
External Email - Use Caution Hello Freesurfer Team, I recently ran analysis to compare change in cortical thickness between an Intervention and Control group longitudinally. The contrast is set up as INT-CON, and therefore I would interpret a positive change as the intervention